2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of linking groups and hydrophobic groups on properties of sulfate Gemini surfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emulsifying activity is one of the most considerable parameters in the study of surfactants. Figure illustrates the time required to separate 10 mL of water from the emulsion formed between surfactant aqueous solution and benzene/α-pinene. It is known that the longer the time is, the better is the emulsifying power of the measured surfactant .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emulsifying activity is one of the most considerable parameters in the study of surfactants. Figure illustrates the time required to separate 10 mL of water from the emulsion formed between surfactant aqueous solution and benzene/α-pinene. It is known that the longer the time is, the better is the emulsifying power of the measured surfactant .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the Kraft points have no relationship with a series of methylene linking groups. The Kraft point of the Gemini surfactant containing benzyl is 1°C higher than those containing methylene series, although the hydrophobic carbon chain is the same in both cases [52]. Usually, electrolytes raise the Kraft temperature, whereas there is no general trend for the dependence on counter ions.…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that the MG uptakes over Cu-BTC@TpPa-1 composite is much better than those of pure Cu-BTC and TpPa-1, attributing to their synergistic interactions such as electrostatic, π-π complexation, and hydrogen bonding interactions, etc (Peng et al, 2018;Zhong et al, 2021). It was detected that the MG uptakes over Cu-BTC@TpPa-1 (12) was signi cantly increased compared with that of Cu-BTC and TpPa-1. However, when more TpPa-1 was incorporated into the support, it is possible that the pore cavities could become blocked, leading to an increase in diffusion resistance during the mass transfer process, which eventually could decrease the amount of accessible active sites to accommodate MG molecules.…”
Section: Adsorption Performance Mg Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 1 displayed the N 2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of Cu-BTC, TpPa-1, Cu-BTC@TpPa-1(12), Cu-BTC@TpPa-1( 24), and Cu-BTC@TpPa-1(36), and the pore volume and surface area and were obtained in Table S1. The isotherms shape of Cu-BTC, TpPa-1, Cu-BTC@TpPa-1 (12), and Cu-BTC@TpPa-1 (24) obviously exhibited type I with a slight hysteresis loop in the light of IUPAC require, which is microporous features (Tian et al, 2019). While the isotherm shape of Cu-BTC@TpPa-1(36) is between type I and IV.…”
Section: Materials Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 97%