2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)01052-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of liquid chromatography separation of complex matrices on liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry signal suppression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
108
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
108
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As recoveries proved to be matrix dependent, the contributions of the extraction procedure and matrix dependent ion suppression were assessed by relating the responses to standard solutions and samples spiked pre-and post-extraction [34] (Table IV). This approach was assessed using raw sewage, the most complex of aqueous samples and therefore the sample likely to contribute the greatest matrix interference.…”
Section: Methods Detection Limits Recoveries and Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recoveries proved to be matrix dependent, the contributions of the extraction procedure and matrix dependent ion suppression were assessed by relating the responses to standard solutions and samples spiked pre-and post-extraction [34] (Table IV). This approach was assessed using raw sewage, the most complex of aqueous samples and therefore the sample likely to contribute the greatest matrix interference.…”
Section: Methods Detection Limits Recoveries and Repeatabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon, which is called the matrix effect, is attributed to the competition between matrix components and analytes for droplet formation in the solution that is sprayed (King et al, 2000;Choi et al, 2001). The effect depends on the nature of both matrices and the analytes (Cech and Enke, 2000;King et al, 2000).…”
Section: Matrix Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However for subsequent determination of method recoveries and matrix experiments 5 g of (air) dried sediment or 0.5 g of dried sludge were spiked with the addition of 5 ml acetone to aid mixing [7] and left for several hours to allow sorption processes to occur. The effects of the sediment matrix and sample preparation on analyte recovery were made by comparing the responses of the instrument to standard solutions and spiked samples ( Table 2) [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%