2019
DOI: 10.1002/slct.201902485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Lithium/Transition‐Metal Ratio on the Electrochemical Properties of Lithium‐Rich Cathode Materials with Different Nickel/Manganese Ratios for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Abstract: A lithium‐rich nickel‐manganese‐based material (Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2) exhibited a high discharge capacity at a low C‐rate. However, this material has problems in that it has a poor rate performance, large potential hysteresis, and poor cycle performance. Although increasing the Ni/Mn ratio for Li1.2Ni0.2Mn0.6O2 ameliorated these problems, it decreased the discharge capacity. In this study, the lithium/transition‐metal (Li/TM) ratios for lithium‐rich layer‐structured cathodes with different Ni/Mn ratios were contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capacities achieved were ~140 mAh/g (15 mA/g), ~64 mAh/g (30 mA/g), and ~57 mAh/g (45 mA/g). The differential capacities of the cathode materials showed all peaks decreasing their intensities with the increase of the current density; additionally, a degradation of the voltage occurred when the current density increased [53,54]. These reductions of electrochemical performance could be explained by considering that, at high current densities, the amount of lithium insertion/extraction is affected due to the structure's surface not allowing to Li ions to leave their sites, resulting in low capacities [46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacities achieved were ~140 mAh/g (15 mA/g), ~64 mAh/g (30 mA/g), and ~57 mAh/g (45 mA/g). The differential capacities of the cathode materials showed all peaks decreasing their intensities with the increase of the current density; additionally, a degradation of the voltage occurred when the current density increased [53,54]. These reductions of electrochemical performance could be explained by considering that, at high current densities, the amount of lithium insertion/extraction is affected due to the structure's surface not allowing to Li ions to leave their sites, resulting in low capacities [46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cathode materials have intrinsic bottlenecks that restrict the energy performance of LIBs . Li‐ and Mn‐rich layered oxides, composed of Li 2 MnO 3 and LiMO 2 (M=Ni, Co, Mn) components, have an ultrahigh reversible capacity (>250 mAh g −1 ) and are supposed to be feasible candidates to satisfy the demand for high‐energy LIBs . The extraordinary capacity of Li‐ and Mn‐rich material is ascribed to the oxygen redox reaction induced by the electrochemical activation of the Li 2 MnO 3 component .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3] Li-and Mn-rich layered oxides, composed of Li 2 MnO 3 and LiMO 2 (M = Ni, Co, Mn) components, have an ultrahigh reversible capacity (> 250 mAh g À 1 ) and are supposed to be feasible candidates to satisfy the demand for high-energy LIBs. [4][5][6] The extraordinary capacity of Li-and Mn-rich material is ascribed to the oxygen redox reaction induced by the electrochemical activation of the Li 2 MnO 3 component. [7][8] Nevertheless, oxygen redox inevitably leads to structural instability and lattice oxygen release from the surface, [9] which results in undesirable battery performances, including low initial coulombic efficiency, poor rate capability and voltage and capacity fade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%