2014
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of living conditions on biochemical and hematological parameters of the cynomolgus monkey

Abstract: The cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) has been increasingly used in biomedical research. Although living conditions affect behavioral and physiological characteristics in macaques, little data is available on how living conditions influence blood-based parameters in the cynomolgus monkey. We hypothesize that there are significant differences in serum biochemical and hematological parameters in single-caged versus socially housed cynomolgus monkeys, and that age and sex influence the effect of living cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enriched animals showed higher hematocrit value relative to SC rats. While some studies have found no effect of housing condition on hematocrit value (Tsai et al, 2002;Watson, 1993), the others have reported lower hematocrit value in subordinate animals (Wehle et al, 1978;Xie et al, 2014). Being subordinated would result in social stress (Fiore et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enriched animals showed higher hematocrit value relative to SC rats. While some studies have found no effect of housing condition on hematocrit value (Tsai et al, 2002;Watson, 1993), the others have reported lower hematocrit value in subordinate animals (Wehle et al, 1978;Xie et al, 2014). Being subordinated would result in social stress (Fiore et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outdoor and social group housing, either harem or multi‐male/multi‐female groups is the gold standard for housing macaques because it replicates, as closely as possible, the normal social environment of macaques [Bernstein, ]. This results in the healthiest and most normal macaques, both behaviorally and biologically, and thus optimal welfare [Capitanio et al, ; Fontenot et al, ; Karere et al, ; O'Neill et al, ; Vandeleest et al, ; Westergaard et al, ; Xie et al, ]. Social life is so critical that captive rhesus macaques in environments with no or limited social interaction frequently develop abnormal behavior and physiology [Anderson & Chamove, ; Capitanio, ; Eaton et al, ; Gottlieb et al, ; Harlow et al, ; Lutz et al, , ; Novak, ; Rommeck et al, ; Suomi et al, ; Vandeleest et al, ].…”
Section: What and Why: Social Housing For Laboratory Rhesus Macaquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions to social housing requirements occur, however, when scientifically justified and approved by an institutional oversight committee (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee or IACUC in the US) for a project or when efforts to socially house an animal are not successful. Accumulating evidence suggests that not all types of social housing provide the same benefits, and further, that changes to animals’ social housing can alter behavior and physiology in ways that indicate reduced welfare and quality as a research model [Capitanio & Cole, ; Clarke et al, ; DiVincenti & Wyatt, ; Gilbert & Baker, ; Gust et al, ; Xie et al, ]. Therefore, accomplishing social housing in a way that both benefits animal welfare and is compatible with research goals can be a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the benefits documented for socializing same‐sex pairs in primates (e.g. Baker et al, []; Becker et al []; DiVincenti et al []; Duarte et al []; Lee et al []; and Xie et al []) these results suggest that giving the owl monkeys the opportunity to live with another conspecific is a viable option when developing a housing plan for owl monkeys. Though there is some risk in forming non‐species typical pairs, the animals are under constant observation during the pairing process, and provides a potentially high benefit to the animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%