2016
DOI: 10.1002/jor.23352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of load on the bone around bone-anchored amputation prostheses

Abstract: Osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses have proven successful as an alternative method to the conventional socket-type prostheses. The method improves prosthetic use and thus increases the demands imposed on the bone-implant system. The hypothesis of the present study was that the loads applied to the bone-anchored implant system of amputees would result in locations of high stress and strain transfer to the bone tissue and thus contribute to complications such as unfavourable bone remodeling and/o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 b) was added to induce a nanoporous structure for improved osseointegration. 15 In addition to the design changes, the surgical technique for lower limb amputations was modified to implant the fixture 20 mm countersunk into the bone to address the problem of distal bone resorption, which was sometimes observed when the fixture was placed flush with the distal bone end, 60 , 72 , 75 and to reduce the risk of infection in the bone-fixture interface. 73 Because a fixture failure requires a major surgical intervention, the system was designed to ensure that the abutment and abutment screw fracture before the fixture, or the bone, should the system be exposed to excessive loads, as these components are more easily replaced than the fixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 b) was added to induce a nanoporous structure for improved osseointegration. 15 In addition to the design changes, the surgical technique for lower limb amputations was modified to implant the fixture 20 mm countersunk into the bone to address the problem of distal bone resorption, which was sometimes observed when the fixture was placed flush with the distal bone end, 60 , 72 , 75 and to reduce the risk of infection in the bone-fixture interface. 73 Because a fixture failure requires a major surgical intervention, the system was designed to ensure that the abutment and abutment screw fracture before the fixture, or the bone, should the system be exposed to excessive loads, as these components are more easily replaced than the fixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stenlund et al 21 reoperation to replace the entire implant will increase. 22 Our study has some limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 36 implant-bone models were prepared, taking into account the variable length of implants from the range of 75 mm to 130 mm (with an increment of 5 mm) and a diameter from 19 mm to 21 mm (with an increment of 1 mm). Additionally, appropriate immersion in bone tissues of the threaded implant, reported in the literature, was also considered [33, 34]. The analysed constructional parameters correspond to the implants that were lately used in clinical conditions [7, 8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%