2006
DOI: 10.5395/jkacd.2006.31.4.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of local anesthesia on pulpal blood flow in mechanically stimulated teeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dental pulp is an oral tissue composed of multiple neural elements. In modern dentistry, local anesthesia of pulpal tissue during treatment has been proven to block the pathway of pain sensation (or transduction) ( 3 ). But, drug injection itself can intensify anxiety and fear, particularly in younger patients ( 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dental pulp is an oral tissue composed of multiple neural elements. In modern dentistry, local anesthesia of pulpal tissue during treatment has been proven to block the pathway of pain sensation (or transduction) ( 3 ). But, drug injection itself can intensify anxiety and fear, particularly in younger patients ( 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the local anesthesia which was applied using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1/80,000 in the present study could play an important role on the bleeding time. Chu et al demonstrated that the use of local anesthesia based on lidocaine and epinephrine decreases the pulpal blood flow and may protect the dental pulp by attenuating the increase in pulpal blood flow caused by tooth preparation [ 41 ]. Moreover, it is known that the infiltration anesthesia is used successfully in the maxillary teeth but is less effective in the mandibular molar regions due to the density of bone [ 42 ]; therefore, block anesthesia was used in the present study for the mandibular molar regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, the 1-per-mil tumescent solution may have shown unfavorable effect for the flap surgery; especially on the perforator-based skin flap. 6 It is believed that epinephrine causes vasoconstrictive effect, 11,12 and perhaps leads to flap necrosis, especially when the large flap is raised immediately after injection. 9 However, Atabey et al 13 contradictorily stated that the application of lidocaine with 1:400,000 and 1:800,000 epinephrine concentrations were found to be safe on the rats' skin flap and delaying raising time of the flaps appeared to not change the rate of flap necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%