1992
DOI: 10.1097/00019501-199203000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of local delivery of heparin and methotrexate on neointimal proliferation in stented porcine coronary arteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some experiments, intracoronary artery stents (FlexStent, Cook, Inc) were deployed in pigs by using techniques similar to those described above and previously published. 22 …”
Section: Balloon Angioplasty Procedures For Swine Coronary Restenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some experiments, intracoronary artery stents (FlexStent, Cook, Inc) were deployed in pigs by using techniques similar to those described above and previously published. 22 …”
Section: Balloon Angioplasty Procedures For Swine Coronary Restenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The animals were killed 7 days after stent implantation, and the hearts were removed as described above. The coronary arteries were dissected from the heart and placed in cold cell-isolation medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified minimal essential medium (DMEM) containing 20 mmol/L HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin, 5 g/mL amphotericin B, and 50 g/mL gentamicin.…”
Section: Western Blot Analysis For Pkg In Swine Neointimal and Medialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) To further improve the clinical results of coronary stenting, attention was directed to coating the stent with material that would reduce their inherent thrombogenicity and decrease the incidence of in-stent restenosis. 2,4,5,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Most coatings tested are placed mainly to provide a biologically inert barrier between the stent surface and the circulating blood. In contrast to these, immobilized-heparin surface coatings have been studied as means of providing a biologically active exterior that interacts with the circulating blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers, using a similar model, failed to find a difference in neointimal formation between the control (bare metal stent) and the heparin-eluting stents. This is probably because the dose of heparin released from the cellulose ester polymer on the stent was too low to be effective (<0.001 U/hr released over the first week) [156]. A stent coated with 3.2 U of ionically bound heparin (which is readily released from the stent so it can be taken up by cells or available to neutralise thrombin [40]) reduced proliferation, thrombus formation and neointimal area in a similar pig model [157].…”
Section: Antithrombotic and Antiplateletmentioning
confidence: 99%