Abstract. We describe our method for measuring mass loss rates of F-M main sequence stars with high-resolution Lyman-α line profiles. Our diagnostic is the extra absorption on the blue side the interstellar hydrogen absorption produced by neutral hydrogen gas in the hydrogen walls of stars. For stars with low X-ray fluxes, the correlation of observed mass loss rate with X-ray surface flux and age predicts the solar wind mass flux between 700 Myr and the present.Keywords. ISM:lines and bands, ISM:magnetic fields, solar wind, stars:winds, Sun: UV radiation, ultraviolet:ISM
Why mass loss rates are needed for the Sun and cool dwarf starsUltraviolet spectroscopy is an important tool for measuring mass loss rates (Ṁ) of massive stars, late-type giants, and premain sequence stars whenṀ> 10 −10 M yr −1 . By comparison, the solar mass loss rate measured by space experiments is far smaller, about 2 × 10 −14 M yr −1 . Until 10 years ago, there were no measured values ofṀ for main sequence stars cooler than about spectral type A because there were no spectral or other diagnostics capable of measuringṀ far smaller than 10 −10 M yr −1 . While mass loss rates similar to the Sun do not significantly reduce a star's mass and thus nuclear evolution during its lifetime (see below), accurate measurements ofṀ are needed for many reasons: (1) the torque exerted by even weak stellar winds reduces the stellar rotation rate and thus the magnetic dynamo and stellar activity, (2) knowledge oḟ M(t) for the young Sun is important for understanding the evolution of the atmospheres of solar system planets like Mars that have lost their magnetic fields, and (3) the discovery of exopolanets close to their host stars highlights the need to predict the properties of stellar winds that impact the atmospheres of these exoplanets. Since we cannot measurė M back in time, it is critical to find a reliable diagnostic to measureṀ for solar-mass stars with a range of ages and coronal properties in order to scale to the young Sun. Unfortunately, theoretical estimates ofṀ are controversial, an empirical relationship betweenṀ and X-ray flux was not previously known, and no space probe will enter an astrosphere to directly measureṀ for a very long time.