2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2017.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of long-term wave climate variability on longshore sediment transport along regional coastlines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…9 and 17% decreases in annual net LST rates were observed for a reduction of 5 and 10% of SWH in all the hourly data of 2011, respectively. A recent study by Chowdhury and Behera (2017) using ERA-I annual and monthly averaged wave parameters has estimated LST rates which vary in the range of 2 to 8 × 10 5 m 3 yr −1 which is larger than reported in this study. This large difference between the present estimate of LST with Chowdhury and Behera (2017) is due to the fact that using the annual average value of wave parameters for LST estimate will lead to large error since the wave parameters show a large variation at shorter time span and also their study was based on data at offshore boundary point.…”
Section: 1029/2018jc014900contrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 and 17% decreases in annual net LST rates were observed for a reduction of 5 and 10% of SWH in all the hourly data of 2011, respectively. A recent study by Chowdhury and Behera (2017) using ERA-I annual and monthly averaged wave parameters has estimated LST rates which vary in the range of 2 to 8 × 10 5 m 3 yr −1 which is larger than reported in this study. This large difference between the present estimate of LST with Chowdhury and Behera (2017) is due to the fact that using the annual average value of wave parameters for LST estimate will lead to large error since the wave parameters show a large variation at shorter time span and also their study was based on data at offshore boundary point.…”
Section: 1029/2018jc014900contrasting
confidence: 80%
“…A recent study by Chowdhury and Behera (2017) using ERA-I annual and monthly averaged wave parameters has estimated LST rates which vary in the range of 2 to 8 × 10 5 m 3 yr −1 which is larger than reported in this study. This large difference between the present estimate of LST with Chowdhury and Behera (2017) is due to the fact that using the annual average value of wave parameters for LST estimate will lead to large error since the wave parameters show a large variation at shorter time span and also their study was based on data at offshore boundary point. Thus, differences in shoreline orientation, source of wave data used in the model, and the temporal resolution of the wave data time-series account to the differences in LST estimates between the present study and previously reported.…”
Section: 1029/2018jc014900contrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Where freshwater runoff contributes to maintain inlets, it may also cause adjacent spit retreat or progradation as rainfall respectively increases or diminishes (Ranasinghe et al ., ). Finally, changing storm tracks, storm intensity and frequency are likely to modify coastal resilience (Masselink et al ., ) and have a direct impact on the wave‐driven LST (Splinter et al ., ; Chowdhury and Behera, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, temporal variations in annual net LST rates were examined using ERA datasets in southeast Queensland, Australia and were linked to climate indices [56]. Along the west coast of India, Jesbin et al [42] and Chowdhury et al [58] estimated temporal variations in LST using ERA datasets and established a link with pacific climate variability and the latitudinal position of the inter-tropical convergence zone (ITCZ), respectively. Hence, we have compared the LSTR estimate based on ERA-Interim with the buoy-measured wave data.…”
Section: Lstr Estimate Based On Era-interim Datamentioning
confidence: 99%