Myopia, or nearsightedness, is a common condition, affecting a substantial percentage of the US population, with an estimated prevalence of 41.6% for individuals aged 12 to 54 years. 1 Its onset occurs early in life as the shape of the eye elongates.While refractive correction with spectacles or contact lenses is usually effective, myopia may progress over time to levels that confer a higher risk of complications in later life, such as glaucoma or retinal detachment. Therefore, much attention has been given to interventions to control myopia progression in children. Methods evaluated include multifocal contact lenses, orthokeratology, and low-dose atropine eyedrops, which have had the most attention in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The authors of the LAMP2 clinical trial reported in JAMA 2 provide (in eTable 1 in their Supplement 2 ) an overview of 27 completed RCTs and 18 ongoing trials of low-dose atropine treatment. What is unique about the LAMP2 trial is its prophylactic rather than therapeutic focus. This RCT was designed to evaluate whether low-dose atropine can prevent or delay the onset of myopia rather than just slow its progression.The authors present a well-designed, placebo-controlled RCT with sound methods, including a sample size that reflects 90% power with a projected attrition rate of 20% and blocked randomization with stratification by age, sex, and mean spherical equivalent. Furthermore, allocation was by a nurse who was masked to outcome data, outcome measures using cycloplegic refraction to obtain spherical equivalent refractive values, and a noncontact partial coherence interferometer measure of axial length. In addition, there was masking throughout the trial of key investigative team members, parents, and the 474 enrolled children aged 4 to 9 years without myopia to the group assignment (0.05% atropine, 0.01% atropine, or placebo delivered once nightly over a 2-year period).Results show a beneficial effect of 0.05% atropine in both primary outcomes. Children receiving this treatment had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of myopia and lower percentage who developed a myopic shift of at least 1.00 diopter relative to children in the placebo and 0.01% atropine groups. Of note was the small percentage of participants who reported adverse events such as photophobia, with no differences among the 3 groups, which should be assuring to parents.The substantial dropout rate (about 25% dropped out in each of the 3 groups) was anticipated in the trial's power cal-