Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrotic lung disease with a poor prognosis. Pirfenidone is approved and widely used for the treatment of IPF and reduces lung function decline. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different doses of pirfenidone for the prevention of disease progression in patients with IPF. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, single-center cohort study conducted in Haeundae Paik Hospital, Republic of Korea, from April 2021 to March 2023. IPF patients were assigned to three groups according to the dose of pirfenidone (600 mg, 1200 mg, 1800 mg). Disease progression was defined as an absolute decline to ≥5% of forced vital capacity (FVC) (% predicted value) or an absolute decline to ≥10% of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) (% predicted value) over 12 months. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the clinical effects of pirfenidone of each dosage on disease progression in IPF patients by comparing the FVC (% predicted value) and DLco (% predicted value) values over 12 months. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the prognostic value of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) in the disease progression in IPF patients using the baseline KL-6 value and the change in KL-6 values between the baseline and 12 months. Results: A total of 44 patients were enrolled, of whom 39 completed the study, with 13 patients assigned to each of the three groups. The median age was 71.7 years, and 79.5% of patients were men. The baseline characteristics were similar across groups, except the 600 mg group was older (75.9 vs. 69.2 vs. 68.2 years, p = 0.016). The overall median change in FVC and DLco over 12 months was −2.7% (IQR: −9.1%, −1.2%) and −3.8% (IQR: −13.6%, −3.7%), respectively. There was no difference in the decline in FVC (change in FVC, % predicted value: −3.23 vs. −4.08 vs. −1.54, p = 0.621) and DLco (change in DLco, % predicted value: 0.00 vs. −3.62 vs. −3.15, p = 0.437) among the three groups. Fourteen patients (35.9%) suffered disease progression. The rate of disease progression did not differ according to the dose of pirfenidone (38.5 vs. 38.5 vs. 30.8%, p = 1.000). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, KL-6 was not a statistically significant predictor of disease progression. Conclusions: In our study, regardless of dose, consistent pirfenidone use for 12 months resulted in similar efficacy for the prevention of disease progression in patients with IPF. Large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed.
