2000
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.01510.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of lung volume on the oesophageal diaphragm EMG assessed by magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation

Abstract: To reassess the effect of lung volume on the oesophageal diaphragm CMAP, six normal subjects were studied using an oesophageal catheter incorporating seven electrodes (number one being proximal and seven distal) that were 1 cm in length and 1 cm apart. Electrode number three was positioned at the centre of the electrically active region of the diaphragm (EARdi) at functional residual capacity (FRC). The diaphragm CMAP elicited by bilateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves was simultaneously recorded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, such electrodes have been considered difficult to position with accuracy; indeed some investigators have considered it necessary to anchor the electrode with a gastric balloon in order to obtain adequate signals [13]. Since this anchoring gives an uncomfortable sensation and, by movement of the balloon with respiration, creates an additional artefact [14], it limits the usefulness of the technique for studies while patients are asleep.…”
Section: Significance Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, such electrodes have been considered difficult to position with accuracy; indeed some investigators have considered it necessary to anchor the electrode with a gastric balloon in order to obtain adequate signals [13]. Since this anchoring gives an uncomfortable sensation and, by movement of the balloon with respiration, creates an additional artefact [14], it limits the usefulness of the technique for studies while patients are asleep.…”
Section: Significance Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When in the optimal position, the electrode catheter was securely taped at the nose. No balloons or weights were used to anchor the catheter (Beck et al 1997;Luo et al 2000b). The sEMGpara was recorded using surface electrodes (Kendall Arbo R ; Tyco healthcare R , Neustadt, Germany).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the effects of respiratory load on neural respiratory drive and the respiratory pattern are key to understanding the regulation of respiratory load compensation in respiratory disease. Recording the diaphragmatic electromyogram (EMGdi) using an oesophageal multipair electrode is a sensitive and reproducible method for the quantification of neural respiratory drive (NRD) in both healthy subjects and patients (Luo et al 2000 a , b , 2008; Jolley et al 2009; Reilly et al 2011). The EMGdi provides a measure of the load on the respiratory muscles (Jolley et al 2009; Murphy et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns about changes in lung volume on the diaphragm EMG have hampered the application of the oesophageal diaphragm EMG in clinical practice. Many studies [53,60,62,65,70,71] have tried to address the effect of lung volume on the amplitude of the diaphragm EMG by using different electrode design. It was hypothesized that a change in the amplitude of the diaphragm CMAP was due to alternations in the distance between the electrode and the diaphragm secondary to the change in lung volume during respiration [65].…”
Section: Effect Of Changes In Lung Volume On the Diaphragm Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also observed that during deep breathing the electrode catheter could move up to 8 cm, which is beyond the maximal movement of the crus [61,70]. The large movement of the catheter during respiration suggested that the catheter with both a balloon and the weight was actually unable to reliably record the diaphragm EMG because the electrodes failed to track the movement of the crus of the diaphragm [70,71]. Previously, we have used a multipair oesophageal electrode with an interelectrode distance of 3 cm within a pair and found that changes in lung volume of up to 2 litres had little effect on the amplitude of the diaphragm CMAP, providing the oesophageal electrode catheter was optimally positioned and then fixed on the nose [71].…”
Section: Effect Of Changes In Lung Volume On the Diaphragm Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%