The huge demand for biocompatible, robust, accurate and noninvasive technology to assess the temperature of a biological targeted site for monitoring the hyperthermia effect brings the topic of remote thermometry to a very high level of interest. There are already promising research directions to fulfil such demand in the short term and a review of the achievements in this issue is certainly worth. This report offers an overview of the research regarding the most promising nanothermometers nowadays, with emphasis on those addressed to remote operation while using optical or magnetic responses of nanosized materials as the thermometric property. More specifically the optical emission intensity, optical emission peak shift and optical emission lifetime will be covered as far as the optical-based nanothermometers are concerned. Additionally, for the magnetic-based nanothermometers the magnetization or the magnetic susceptibility are the thermometric properties covered in this review. Furthermore, the review includes the hyperthermia effect based on nanosized metallic or magnetic particles plus a couple of thermally-responsive polymeric drug delivery systems, aiming to provide an integrated view of the multipurpose platform offered by actuating-sensing nanoparticles. As far as the regulatory system is concerned the availability of noninvasive thermometry incorporating biocompatibility, robustness and accuracy will establish the grounds needed for the approval of the hyperthermia technology for therapeutic purposes, thus allowing the market of this technological option on a global scale.hyperthermia and thermoresponsive drug delivery systems for clinical use.Although nanothermometry is at its infancy considerable progress has been made recently in regard to its use for remote assessing the temperature at the site the nanomaterials are incorporated to. Nanoprobes allowing remote temperature-sensing using optical or magnetic properties are among the most promising directions nowadays. Most of the optical-based nanothermometers use the light-emitting intensity [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], light-emitting peak shift [24][25][26], or lifetime decay of a suitable optical band as the thermometric property [27][28][29][30]. As far as the clinical use is concerned the drawbacks of the actual optical-based nanothermometers rely on biocompatibility (usual semiconductor-based core nanoprobes or dye-based shell moieties are toxic), robustness (typical bleaching of organic-based shell moieties) or temperature accuracy (no better than 0.3°C nowadays), or even combination of these factors. Moreover, due to limitations imposed by living tissues on the optical penetration of light (optical therapeutic window in the 700-1100 nm wavelength range), noninvasive clinical use of optical excitation and signal pickup is a huge challenge, not yet solved, except for very special therapeutic applications, as for instance the photodynamic therapy for treatment (heating monitoring) of skin cancer and follow up [31]. Alternatively, ...