1986
DOI: 10.1021/jf00068a051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Maillard reaction products on protein digestion. In vitro studies

Abstract: The low molecular weight fraction of a glucose-lysine reaction mixture, previously shown to affect the in vivo uptake of proteins in the rat, was tested for its effect on a number of gastrointestinal proteases and peptidases in vitro. Of these, carboxypeptidase A was significantly inhibited by 0.5 mg/mL of the Maillard products, and aminopeptidase N (a key enzyme in the brush border hydrolysis of peptides) was strongly inhibited by 0.25 mg/mL. The inhibition of aminopeptidase N was of the mixed type while the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Seiquer et al (2006) found that consumption of a diet rich in a Maillard reaction product (3.87 mg/kg hydroxymethylfurfural) led to 47% higher fecal nitrogen excretion and 6% lower total nitrogen digestibility than a calorie-and macronutrient-matched diet containing a lower concentration of the same product (0.94 mg/kg). It is believed that the Maillard reaction affects protein digestibility partly by destroying essential amino acids (Moughan et al, 1996;Rerat et al, 2002), inducing structural changes in protein that prevent normal enzymatic cleavage (Kato et al, 1986;Oste and Sjodin, 1984), impeding epithelial transport (Shorrock and Ford, 1978), and actively inhibiting digestive enzymes (Oste et al, 1986(Oste et al, , 1987Rudloff and Lonnerdal, 1992). Nevertheless, to our knowledge, the impact of Maillard reaction products on ileal, rather than fecal, digestibility has not yet been evaluated.…”
Section: Increased Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Seiquer et al (2006) found that consumption of a diet rich in a Maillard reaction product (3.87 mg/kg hydroxymethylfurfural) led to 47% higher fecal nitrogen excretion and 6% lower total nitrogen digestibility than a calorie-and macronutrient-matched diet containing a lower concentration of the same product (0.94 mg/kg). It is believed that the Maillard reaction affects protein digestibility partly by destroying essential amino acids (Moughan et al, 1996;Rerat et al, 2002), inducing structural changes in protein that prevent normal enzymatic cleavage (Kato et al, 1986;Oste and Sjodin, 1984), impeding epithelial transport (Shorrock and Ford, 1978), and actively inhibiting digestive enzymes (Oste et al, 1986(Oste et al, , 1987Rudloff and Lonnerdal, 1992). Nevertheless, to our knowledge, the impact of Maillard reaction products on ileal, rather than fecal, digestibility has not yet been evaluated.…”
Section: Increased Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is probably due to reactions between amino groups and reducing sugars during micronization, which could result in the formation of low molecular weight Maillard reaction products (Oste, Dahlqvist, Sjostrom, Noren & Miller, 1986). The Maillard reaction products formed have some antioxidant activity (Vhangani and Van Wyk, 2013), which can inhibit protein digestion (Oste & Sjodin, 1986).…”
Section: Protein and Lysine Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process lowers protein digestibility (Seiquer et al 2006). Mechanisms include the destruction of essential amino acids (Rerat et al 2002), structural changes in protein that prevent normal enzymatic cleavage (Oste and Sjodin 1984;Kato et al 1986), the impedance of epithelial transport (Shorrock and Ford 1978), and the inhibition of digestive enzymes (Oste et al 1987). Maillard reactions are largely restricted to surfaces of meat.…”
Section: Effects Of Cooking On Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%