2020
DOI: 10.1177/0144598720928150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of matching relation of multi-scale, randomly distributed pores on geometric distribution of induced cracks in hydraulic fracturing

Abstract: Reservoir rock contains many multi-scale, unevenly distributed pores, and the pore structures of shale in different reservoirs and geological environments vary greatly. Because the seepage velocity and pressure field are related to the pore spatial variations, the inhomogeneity of the seepage is superimposed on the anisotropy of the rock’s physical properties, which will affect the distribution of the induced cracks. A method for calculating the pore size in the bonded particle model, based on Delaunay triangu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0 | WZA = 10 4 × 0 = 10 −11 m 2 /Pa s. The WZA zone represents the presence of a zone that has a different geomaterial with a close mechanical stiffness, but a much larger permeability. The presence of such inhomogenieties within the reservoir, at various scales, has been previously discussed in various studies (Peng 2020;Yang et al 2018;Baykin and Golovin 2016;Legarth et al 2005). • Weak Zone B (WZB): The weak zone in this modeling case has an initial degraded stiffness of one percent of the intact material stiffness and a higher initial permeability that is three order of magnitudes higher than the rest of the domain , i. the weak zone has a high permeability, the high fluid flow intensity in the damage zone forced the evolution of damage of the WZA zone.…”
Section: Effects Of the Presence Of Pre-existing Weak Zonesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…0 | WZA = 10 4 × 0 = 10 −11 m 2 /Pa s. The WZA zone represents the presence of a zone that has a different geomaterial with a close mechanical stiffness, but a much larger permeability. The presence of such inhomogenieties within the reservoir, at various scales, has been previously discussed in various studies (Peng 2020;Yang et al 2018;Baykin and Golovin 2016;Legarth et al 2005). • Weak Zone B (WZB): The weak zone in this modeling case has an initial degraded stiffness of one percent of the intact material stiffness and a higher initial permeability that is three order of magnitudes higher than the rest of the domain , i. the weak zone has a high permeability, the high fluid flow intensity in the damage zone forced the evolution of damage of the WZA zone.…”
Section: Effects Of the Presence Of Pre-existing Weak Zonesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Classification of pores within cementitious and composite materials is the basis for understanding the multi-functionality of additives and the type of adopted curing. Pore classification is generally based on their shapes, such as geometric pores [180], or their type, such as 1. open pores, 2. through pores (pores open from two sides), and 3. closed pores [181]. In size, however, they are generally categorized as micropores (below 1 nm), mesopores (1-25 nm), macropore (25-50 nm), and fracture (above 50 nm [182][183][184].…”
Section: Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic fracturing is considered one of the most effective fracking techniques for shale gas extraction today and has been widely recognized and applied in engineering [15][16][17][18]. Shale gas reservoirs are highly inhomogeneous and anisotropic, and reservoir-geomechanics-fracturing simulations are used to investigate the effect of subsequent parent well injection on interwell fracture disturbance and changes in induced stresses [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%