2000
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-200006000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Maternal Nutrition on Brown Adipose Tissue and Its Prolactin Receptor Status in the Fetal Lamb

Abstract: We investigated the influence of maternal nutritional enhancement during the second half of gestation on prolactin receptor (PRLR) abundance in fetal brown adipose tissue (BAT) and liver close to term (i.e. 141-144 d gestation). Ewes were provided with 100% (i.e. control; n = 8) or 150% (i.e. well-fed; n = 7) of their metabolic requirements from 80 to 144 d gestation. Crude plasma membranes were prepared from fetal BAT and hepatic tissue, and individual molecular weight isoforms for the long and short forms of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, placental glucose transport capacity was not different between the overnourished and the control ewes when expressed on a placental weight-specific basis, indicating that the small size of the placenta per se is the major limitation to placental glucose transfer (Wallace et al, 2002). In contrast, increased nutrient intake during the second half of gestation in adult ewes resulted in greater foetal body mass but less perirenal adipose tissue at day 140 of gestation in the well-fed dams as compared to the control (Budge et al, 2000).…”
Section: Energy or Global Undernutrition And Overnutritionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, placental glucose transport capacity was not different between the overnourished and the control ewes when expressed on a placental weight-specific basis, indicating that the small size of the placenta per se is the major limitation to placental glucose transfer (Wallace et al, 2002). In contrast, increased nutrient intake during the second half of gestation in adult ewes resulted in greater foetal body mass but less perirenal adipose tissue at day 140 of gestation in the well-fed dams as compared to the control (Budge et al, 2000).…”
Section: Energy or Global Undernutrition And Overnutritionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition to alterations of glucocorticoids, insulin and IGF-1, maternal under-or overnutrition during gestation also was reported to result in changes of other maternal hormone levels such as progesterone, oestrogen, prolactin, thyroid hormones, growth hormone and leptin (Wallace et al, 1997(Wallace et al, , 2003Ashworth et al, 2000;Budge et al, 2000;Thomas et al, 2001;Bispham et al, 2003;Fernandez-Twinn et al, 2003;Bloomfield et al, 2004). Whether glucocorticoids are primarily triggered by foetal nutrient surplus or shortage and act as master regulator orchestrating other endocrine systems is unclear.…”
Section: Protein Undernutrition and Protein Excessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which such a process maybe be reset by the early nutritional environment is unknown, but in species with a long gestation fat cells first appear at about mid gestation (32,33) before total fat mass increases up to term, as the fetus lays down sufficient energy reserves to enable it to meet the cold challenge of the extrauterine environment (15) . Importantly, the net effect is to promote the abundance of brown fat in the offspring (34,35) under thermal or nutritional environments that may act to enhance fetal development. In addition, term infants are born with substantial amounts of subcutaneous fat (36) that increase during lactation, before being mobilised during infancy with its increased energy expenditure in motor development.…”
Section: Early Determinants Of Fat Cell Number and Fat Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein extraction and western blotting Mitochondria were prepared from 0.2 g frozen adipose tissue as described previously (Budge et al 2000) and the protein content of each preparation determined (Bradford 1976). UCP1 content was measured, with 10 mg mitochondrial protein run on 12% SDS gel, which was transferred onto a membrane (Imobilon, Millipore, Molsheim, France) and incubated for 1 h with the UCP1 antibody (1/10 000 dilution; Schermer et al 1996) followed by 1 h of incubation with a donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1/2000 dilution; Abcam, Paris, France; ab16284).…”
Section: Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%