Effect of matrix and hybrid reinforcement on fibre metal laminates under low–velocity impact loading

Hussain, Muzzamal; Imad, A.; Nawab, Yasir; Saouab, Abdelghani; Herbelot, Christophe; Kanit, Toufik

doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115371

Cited by 42 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The comprehensive performance of FMLs is not only related to the properties of fibers, matrix and metal, but also closely related to the arrangement of fibers, the interface binding strength of fiber layer/metal layer, shear strength, etc. [101][102][103][104]. The related test methods are introduced in detail in the mechanical properties test, and this section only introduces the constitutive model and failure criteria.…”

Section: Application Of Numerical Simulation Technology In Performanc...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of FMLs performance test methods and index evaluation

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With its excellent fatigue performance and high damage tolerance and other irreplaceable advantages, FMLs have gradually increased the demand in aerospace, rail transit, ship and other fields, and have put forward higher requirements for the speed and accuracy of its performance test and index evaluation. In this paper, the methods of performance test, analysis and index evaluation of FMLs are introduced from three aspects with carbon fiber and composite materials, mechanical properties and numerical simulation technology, details the common test methods, the latest technology and progress, and analyzes their advantages and disadvantages, so as to provide direction and reference for the performance test method and index evaluation of FMLs. Finally, the main development directions of the current performance testing methods and index evaluation of FMLs are briefly discussed.

show abstract

Section: Application Of Numerical Simulation Technology In Performanc...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of FMLs performance test methods and index evaluation

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…PC resin is more brittle in nature than PVB resin, therefore it showed lower deflection and visible cracks. [40][41][42] While PVB resin is flexible and tough in nature, therefore the deflection is high, and the cracks are minor.…”

Section: Flexural Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of auxeticity on mechanical properties of3Dwoven auxetic reinforced thermoplastic composites

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D woven composites are currently used in high-tech applications due to their better mechanical properties than 2D laminated composites. To further enhance the mechanical performance of 3D woven composites, auxetic structures can be used as reinforcement. The auxetic structures showed better mechanical properties due to bidimensional energy dissipation capability. Orthogonal 3D woven structures showed inherent auxetic nature, however, the use of brittle thermoset resins in composites fully limits their auxeticity. To overcome this issue, three types of 3D woven auxetic structures (warp, weft, and bidirectional interlocks) were developed and used as reinforcement with thermoplastic resins (PC and PVB). Auxeticity of woven reinforcement, and tensile, flexural (3-point), and short beam shear (SBS) tests of composites were conducted. Auxeticity results revealed that the warp interlock structure showed the highest auxeticity, while the bidirectional interlock structure exhibited the least auxeticity due to the high number of intersections and crimp %. Furthermore, warp interlock composite structure showed 47%, 49.5%, and 37% higher tensile, flexural, and shear strength values, respectively than bidirectional interlock structure in warp direction with PC resin. The overall results showed that auxetic reinforcement improved the mechanical performance of 3D woven composites.

show abstract

“…[1,2] Park et al [3] reported that due to the different natures of the two materials, joining composite components with metal alloys has been a serious problem. [4][5][6] Beiss et al [7] and Rhee et al [8] reported that the most common method of joining composite parts is adhesive bonding. Maressa et al [9] proposed that adhesive joints have a more even stress distribution, have lower stress concentration around corners, higher peel strength, and have a longer fatigue life than bolted joints.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of surface treatment on the performance of composite‐composite and composite‐metal adhesive joints

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites (FRPCs) in automotive, aerospace, and naval applications has increased significantly due to the requirement for a high performance-to-weight ratio. One the issue in using composite parts is their joining to the metal parts in the global structure. Several joining techniques such as mechanical joining, adhesive, vibration joining, and hybrid joining are used for this purpose. Being lighter in weight and lower in cost in comparison to other techniques, adhesive bonding is mostly used for composite-composite and composite-metal joining. To achieve reliable adhesive joining, surface preparation of the joining substrates is of utmost importance. Though the effect of physical surface treatments on the performance of joints has been reported in the literature, however, the effect of chemical surface treatment of composites on the mechanical performance of adhesive joints was rarely studied. In this article, the effect of chemical treatment (alkaline permanganate), of the composite surfaces on the single lap shear strength and Izod impact strength of composite-composite and composite-metal adhesive joints is reported. The results showed that the chemically treated joints demonstrate a significant improvement in these properties.

show abstract

Effect of matrix and hybrid reinforcement on fibre metal laminates under low–velocity impact loading

Cited by 42 publications

References 39 publications

A review of FMLs performance test methods and index evaluation

A review of FMLs performance test methods and index evaluation

Impact of auxeticity on mechanical properties of3Dwoven auxetic reinforced thermoplastic composites

Effect of surface treatment on the performance of composite‐composite and composite‐metal adhesive joints

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About