2012
DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2012.671846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of maturity at harvest onin vitromethane production from ensiled grass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower NDF contents of SM may be attributed to differences in maturity stages (vegetative vs. heading) at which millet was harvested and ensiled. Advancement in maturity of grass forages is usually associated with reduced CP, and increased NDF and ADF contents (Rinne et al, 1997;Cone et al, 1999;Holtshausen et al, 2012). However, this was not evidenced when comparing the findings of our study with those of Amer and Mustafa (2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower NDF contents of SM may be attributed to differences in maturity stages (vegetative vs. heading) at which millet was harvested and ensiled. Advancement in maturity of grass forages is usually associated with reduced CP, and increased NDF and ADF contents (Rinne et al, 1997;Cone et al, 1999;Holtshausen et al, 2012). However, this was not evidenced when comparing the findings of our study with those of Amer and Mustafa (2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Forage millet had a higher effective in situ degradability of NDF than CS (Table 3). Our findings were somewhat expected, given the fact that advanced maturity of forages is negatively correlated with fiber (NDF and ADF) digestibility (Rinne et al, 2002;Holtshausen et al, 2012). Whereas CS is normally harvested at mature stages, forage millet was harvested earlier at the vegetative stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In line with our results, Holtshausen et al. () reported a decrease in in vitro gas and CH 4 production of grass silage (mixture of timothy and meadow fescue) with progressing maturity at harvest, resulting from a shift in the volatile fatty acid pattern observed. In contrast, Purcell, O'Brien, Boland, O'Donovan, and O'Kiely () in their study on perennial ryegrass pastures reported an increased in vitro rumen gas and CH 4 production for a high herbage mass (i.e., smaller OM digestibility and CP content in the grass compared to a low herbage mass), although the difference between treatments was small, likely owing to the similar fibre content and the unchanged volatile fatty acid pattern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Assessment of in vitro gas production (GP) is largely used to evaluate the nutritive value of ruminant feeds by incubating substrate in buffered rumen fluid (Cone, Van Gelder, Visscher, & Oudshoorn, 1996;Dijkstra, Kebreab, Bannink, France, & Lopez, 2005;Getachew, Blümmel, Makkar, & Becker, 1998). This in vitro approach can also be used to evaluate different feeding strategies for their potential to mitigate CH 4 production (Hatew et al, 2015;Holtshausen et al, 2012;Pellikaan et al, 2011). There is a lack of studies reporting in vivo CH 4 production by cattle upon changes in the maturity of a grass silage at harvest (Randby, Weisbjerg, Nørgaard, & Heringstad, 2012;Warner, Bannink, Hatew, Van Laar, & Dijkstra, 2017), and there is a dearth of direct in vitro-in vivo comparisons with respect to CH 4 production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of in vitro gas production (GP) is largely used to evaluate the nutritive value of ruminant feeds by incubating substrate in buffered rumen fluid (Cone et al, 1996;Getachew et al, 1998;Dijkstra et al, 2005). This in vitro approach can also be used to evaluate different feeding strategies for their potential to mitigate CH 4 production (Pellikaan et al, 2011;Holtshausen et al, 2012;Hatew et al, 2015). Currently, only a limited number of studies are available reporting in vivo CH 4 production of cattle upon changes in maturity of wholeplant corn at harvest (Cammell et al, 2000;Mc Geough et al, 2010;Hatew et al, 2016), and a dearth of direct in vitro-in vivo comparisons exist with respect to CH 4 production (Yáñez-Ruiz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%