2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mechanical stability on fracture healing — an update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
124
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
124
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the high sensitivity of the regenerative processes in the cortical calvarial defect to the highfrequency signal, even cortical bone can respond to this mechanical signal if the skeleton is undergoing modeling [17,49]. Together with recent data suggesting mechanical stimuli may accelerate differentiation and/or proliferation of cells in general [19,25], and encourage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells toward the osteogenic cell lineage [9,38], this may suggest the presence of specific stem cells and osteogenic cell populations are critical for efficacy of high-frequency mechanical signals. The benefit of the applied mechanical signal continued even during the 4-week rest period, perhaps suggesting the additional bone and vessels formed during the treatment period acted as a secondary resource for osteogenic and stem cells or the mechanism triggered by the signal remained active even after the stimulus had subsided [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Consistent with the high sensitivity of the regenerative processes in the cortical calvarial defect to the highfrequency signal, even cortical bone can respond to this mechanical signal if the skeleton is undergoing modeling [17,49]. Together with recent data suggesting mechanical stimuli may accelerate differentiation and/or proliferation of cells in general [19,25], and encourage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells toward the osteogenic cell lineage [9,38], this may suggest the presence of specific stem cells and osteogenic cell populations are critical for efficacy of high-frequency mechanical signals. The benefit of the applied mechanical signal continued even during the 4-week rest period, perhaps suggesting the additional bone and vessels formed during the treatment period acted as a secondary resource for osteogenic and stem cells or the mechanism triggered by the signal remained active even after the stimulus had subsided [42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The few bioreactor designs that allow for such patient-specific or jointshape-like geometries, indicated in Table 1 as 'GEOM', all use unconfined compression setups [45,47,59,67]. It should be noted that the deformation or mechanical loading of the material in these systems is probably not homogenous and it will therefore be even more challenging to obtain reproducible results with these systems, compared to regular bioreactor systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further enhance nutrient delivery to cells in the center of constructs, bioreactors have been designed by which perfusion is forced through the constructs (Fig. 1D) [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. This forced perfusion not only delivers nutrients, but induces shear forces to the seeded cells as well.…”
Section: Bioreactors and Mechanical Stimu-lationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A rigidez do sistema de instrumentação é responsável pela estabilidade inicial da coluna vertebral logo após a fixação da fratura e é durante este período inicial do pós-operatório (antes da consolidação da fratura) que ocorrem as perdas de redução com a fixação pedicular curta 2,11,12 . Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a rigidez biomecânica da fixação pedicular curta e compará-la com a rigidez biomecânica da coluna vertebral íntegra e da coluna vertebral com fratura explosão, para uma melhor compreensão dos motivos da falência inicial deste tipo de instrumentação.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified