1965
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mechanical stimulation on rabbits' eyes: release of active substance in anterior chamber perfusates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
2
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
55
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…that to scratching or laser irradiation of the iris (Ambache, Kavanagh & Whiting, 1965;Cole & Unger, 1973; which has hitherto been designated as prostaglandin-mediated would seem necessarily to include this nervous component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that to scratching or laser irradiation of the iris (Ambache, Kavanagh & Whiting, 1965;Cole & Unger, 1973; which has hitherto been designated as prostaglandin-mediated would seem necessarily to include this nervous component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the sensitive colon preparations from Meriones libycus for irin, and later prostaglandin, assays was introduced by Ambache et al (1965). The species is now known as Meriones shawi (Ambache et al, 1966;Ambache & Brummer, 1968).…”
Section: Jird Colonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there was good evidence that prostaglandins are involved in the response of the rabbit eye to irritation. It was also well known that the raibbit eye responds to chemical or mechanical irritation with a prolonged miosis, vasodilatation, increased capillary permeability and a sustained rise in IOP (Duke-Elder & Duke-Elder, 1931 ;Davson & Quilliam, 1947 ;Perkins, 1957); these effects cannot be prevented by the previous administration of atropine and mepyramine (Ambache et al, 1965), and the prolonged miosis is mimicked both in vivo and in vitro by the administration of irin (Ambache, 1956(Ambache, , 1957. This strongly suggests that both vascular effects and alterations in the permeability of the blood-aqueous barrier are in,fact involved in the IOP response of rabbits to prostaglandins.…”
Section: Intracameral Injections Of Prostaglandins E1 and E2 Resultedmentioning
confidence: 99%