2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of meiotic status, cumulus cells and cytoskeleton stabilizer on the developmental competence of ovine oocytes following vitrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mo et al (2014) also reported similar results for survival, cleavage and blastocyst formation rates for ovine matured oocytes with or without cumulus cells after warming. However, Shirazi et al (2012) reported that when vitrification solution contained 20% fetal bovine serum, higher rate of cleavage was observed for sheep COC (53%) than for denuded oocytes (41%).…”
Section: Cumulus Cells: Coc Vs Denuded Oocytessupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mo et al (2014) also reported similar results for survival, cleavage and blastocyst formation rates for ovine matured oocytes with or without cumulus cells after warming. However, Shirazi et al (2012) reported that when vitrification solution contained 20% fetal bovine serum, higher rate of cleavage was observed for sheep COC (53%) than for denuded oocytes (41%).…”
Section: Cumulus Cells: Coc Vs Denuded Oocytessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, when oocytes were pre-treated with taxol for 30 min before vitrification, the survival rate after vitrification and the developmental competence were improved. This study showed that the cryosurvival and cleavage rates of taxol treated oocytes were higher than for those treated with and control oocytes (Mo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Stabilizers Of Cytoskeletonmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shirazi et al (2012) found that despite the lack of difference in survival rate of ovine oocytes vitrified at MII or GV, matured oocytes showed a higher resistance to vitrification with cleavage rate of 53%, higher than the rate obtained for immature oocytes (37%). Mo et al (2014) also demonstrated that the meiotic status determines the ability of sheep oocytes to survive vitrification while MII oocytes showed the highest survival rates and developmental competence after vitrification. Quan et al (2014) compared the vitrification of immature with MII goat oocytes and described that the rate of vitrified/thawed MII oocytes with normal morphology and cleavage rate after parthenogenetic activation were significantly higher than 431vitrified/thawed GV oocytes.…”
Section: Effect Of Developmental Stagementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, efforts should be made to further improve the efficiency of mammalian oocyte cryopreservation, especially in small ruminant species including sheep and goats. Given these facts, several investigations have used different strategies to enhance the developmental ability of vitrified‐warmed ovine oocytes, such as utilization of different cryo‐devices (Fernández‐Reyez et al, ; Quan et al, ; Succu et al, ) and various combinations of cryoprotectants (Kumar, Gautam, & Gahlawat, ), pretreatment of oocyte with cytoskeletal stabilizers like cytochalasin B (Shirazi et al, ; Silvestre, Yaniz, Salvador, Santolaria, & Lopez‐Gatius, ; Zhang, Nedambale, Yang, & Li, ), introduction of trehalose into cytoplasm (Berlinguer et al, ), vitrification at various developmental stages (Mo et al, ) and addition of nonpenetrating CPAs (Chen et al, ; Eroglu, ; Eroglu, Bailey, Toner, & Toth, ; Wright, Eroglu, Toner, & Toth, ). Nonpenetrating CPAs such as sucrose and trehalose are known to reduce possible toxic effects of penetrating CPAs and avoid cell swelling during vitrification and warming procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%