1956
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(56)90028-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mescaline and L.S.D. on evoked responses especially of the optic system of the cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1958
1958
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sole example of this group was mescaline, the psychotropic actions of which were first described by Heffter in 1896. According to Marrazzi & Hart (1955), mescaline weakly depresses the transcallosal cortical response and, when applied topically, it raises the threshold for direct cortical stimulation (Rovetta, 1956). In the present investigation mescaline was only rather feebly depressant.…”
Section: Section Hisupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The sole example of this group was mescaline, the psychotropic actions of which were first described by Heffter in 1896. According to Marrazzi & Hart (1955), mescaline weakly depresses the transcallosal cortical response and, when applied topically, it raises the threshold for direct cortical stimulation (Rovetta, 1956). In the present investigation mescaline was only rather feebly depressant.…”
Section: Section Hisupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The present observations permit yet another postulate, namely, that lysergic acid diethylamide, and other tryptamine-like compounds with actions upon the central nervous system, are interfering with the synaptic activity of a transmitter identical with or similar to that responsible for the excitation of lateral geniculate neurones. It is also conceivable that at some central synapses 5-hydroxytryptamine is a transmitter, and consequently the effects produced by intravenous injections of tryptamine derivatives (Szara, 1957 ;Tedeschi, Tedeschi & Fellows, 1959 ;Vane, Collier, Come, Marley & Bradley, 1961) or by the systemic or intraventricular application of 5-hydroxytryptaMine analogues and antagonists (Gaddum & Vogt, 1956;Purpura, 1956aPurpura, , 1956bRovetta, 1956;Ginzel, 1957;Bradley, 1958;Malcolm, 1958;Smythies, Koella & Levy, 1960) will be complex phenomena depending upon which synapses are affected and whether the compounds mimic or block the action of the transmitters. The possibility must also be considered that 5-hydroxytryptamine-like compounds may be operating normally in the central nervous system, not as excitatory or inhibitory transmitters, but as postsynaptic blocking agents of transmitter action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purpura14 found facilitation of visual cortical potentials with small doses, whereas Evarts8 found no significant effect with very large doses. Rovetta 18 used LSD topically and intravenously in small doses and reported an absence of effect onboth visual and auditory potentials. Large doses of the drug have been used infrequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%