2021
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1933659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of metal type on the energy absorption of fiber metal laminates under low-velocity impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the mechanical response of such structures under dynamic loading conditions and high strain rates is vital from the aspect of engineering design. The high strain rates for the ballistic and blast impacts reach >( ) 15 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the mechanical response of such structures under dynamic loading conditions and high strain rates is vital from the aspect of engineering design. The high strain rates for the ballistic and blast impacts reach >( ) 15 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the mechanical response of such structures under dynamic loading conditions and high strain rates is vital from the aspect of engineering design. The high strain rates for the ballistic and blast impacts reach >(10 − −10 4 s −1 ) [15][16][17][18][19] . Typical construction of fiber-metal laminates include metallic/ alloy skins stacked alongside fiber reinforced polymer laminae 6,[20][21][22][23] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was found that the FMLs had a much higher resistance than aluminum and composite layers against impact, also by comparing the FML types (ARALL, CARALL and GLARE), they concluded that GLARE had better impact properties and was able to absorb more energy [7][8][9]. After Vlot, during the last two decades, numerous researches have been performed to examine the impact behavior of the FMLs considering the effect of various parameters and factors, such as layup configuration [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], metal constituents [10,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23], distribution of layers [24][25][26], thickness effect [19,[27][28][29], impactor geometry [30][31][32], strain rate [33][34][35][36],repeated impact response [1,[37][38][39][40] and damage area [26,41]. Additionally, Jakubczak et al [42] evaluated the FML damage mechanisms at low energy impacts and reported that matrix fractures (at the fiber/matrix interface), fiber cracking, and delamination were the main modes of damage.The low-velocity impact damage is an important failure pattern in FML structures and complex damage modes make it more challenging to characterize the low-velocity impact be...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%