2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of micellization on acid dissociation and headgroup conformation of hexadecyl(2-hydroxyethyl)dimethylammonium bromide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alkyl side chains of all the surfactants were simplified to ethyl groups as the effect of added methylene groups on electronic structure becomes negligible. 27 In light of low aggregation number of 15 reported earlier 15 for C 16 TPB and the low value of 25 for C 16 TBuB determined by our group using steady state fluorescence quenching, 48 the examination at molecular level is relevant. Simple modeling of a micelle of C 16 TPB using GaussView03 visualization program 49 (structure is not reported due to complexity) depicted a significant distance (over 14 Å ) between surfactant head groups.…”
Section: Molecular Modelingmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The alkyl side chains of all the surfactants were simplified to ethyl groups as the effect of added methylene groups on electronic structure becomes negligible. 27 In light of low aggregation number of 15 reported earlier 15 for C 16 TPB and the low value of 25 for C 16 TBuB determined by our group using steady state fluorescence quenching, 48 the examination at molecular level is relevant. Simple modeling of a micelle of C 16 TPB using GaussView03 visualization program 49 (structure is not reported due to complexity) depicted a significant distance (over 14 Å ) between surfactant head groups.…”
Section: Molecular Modelingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Molecular modeling technique of selective head groups interacting with bromide ion was carried out in the present study, to evaluate structures and charge distribution that may be kinetically relevant. 27,28…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p K a shift in micellar solutions is attributed to the fact that the microenvironment of the solute, particularly the dielectric constant, is different in the micelle and in the bulk aqueous solvent. , To quantify this effect, the notion of a micellar K a , denoted as K a,m , can be used. K a,m is the value of K a,app in the presence of surfactant only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we decided to take advantage of the acid−base properties of the solutes (presence of a carboxylic group) to determine the partition coefficients by the quantitative evaluation of p K a . Indeed, the effect of the micellar systems on the acid−base properties of a large variety of molecules is well- known. A p K a shift is usually observed in the presence of micelles and can be explained in terms of differences between the properties of the solvent in the bulk and in the micellar pseudophase (modification of the dielectric constant and electrostatic effects) . Pramauro and Pelizzetti first introduced a relation between these p K a shifts and the partition coefficients. , In the present work, this relation is modified by taking into account the micellar pseudophase and bulk volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, under experimental conditions with pH < 11, the contribution of these pathways to the observed reaction rate is extremely small since, firstly, the values of pK a1 and pK a2 , in all likelihood, are ³12.0 (for choline-like monomeric surfactants IV-VI, the pK a values were found to be~12.9 (IV),~12.4 (V), and~12.7 (VI) [8]) and, secondly, the reactivity of the highly-basic alcoholate ions in water is comparable to or even less than for the hydroxide ion [9]. Thus, taking account of the pK a1 and pK a2 values, the fraction of the reactive anionic form of detergents I and II cannot exceed 5·10 -2 , i.e., the contribution of alcoholysis to the observed reaction rate constant is negligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%