1986
DOI: 10.2527/jas1986.6351329x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Microbial Inoculation of Whole-Plant Corn Silage on Chemical Characteristics, Preservation and Utilization by Steers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
2
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Inoculation of maize silage increased (P <0.05) N retention compared to the control (Table 4), which is consistent with other researchers (Luther, 1986;Okine et al, 2005;. Rooke et al (1988) attributed the improvements in N retention with inoculated silages to a reduction in the urinary excretion of N. However, in the present study, increases in N retention appeared to be related to an improved N digestion as opposed to a reduction in urinary N excretion (McAllister et al, 1998).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Inoculation of maize silage increased (P <0.05) N retention compared to the control (Table 4), which is consistent with other researchers (Luther, 1986;Okine et al, 2005;. Rooke et al (1988) attributed the improvements in N retention with inoculated silages to a reduction in the urinary excretion of N. However, in the present study, increases in N retention appeared to be related to an improved N digestion as opposed to a reduction in urinary N excretion (McAllister et al, 1998).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As expected, because of the restricted feeding, no differences were found in compound feed DM intake. These results were similar to those reported by Muck and Kung Jr. [7]; however, some researchers found that feeding microbial inoculated silage to cattle does not affect dry matter intake compared to noninoculated silage [26, 26]. A combination of increased DM intake and higher energy, in the silage treated with BSM, led to a significant increase ( P < 0.05) in metabolizable energy intake compared to those animals fed with the CT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Rams fed PHWB silage treated with enzyme/inoculant had significantly lower (P < 0.05) NI and total N excretion compared to other treatments (Table 4). However, rams fed treated PHWB silage had greater (P < 0.05) N retention (as % of NI) and N digestibility compared to those fed on control PHWB silage, which concurs other reports from different silages (Luther, 1986;McAllister et al, 1998;Islam et al, 2001;Nkosi et al, 2010). In contrast, Burghardi et al (1980) reported lack of improvement in N retention with microbial inoculation.…”
Section: Nutrient Digestionsupporting
confidence: 87%