Antibody against cytoplasmic myosin, when microinjected into actively dividing cells, provides a physiological test for the role of actin and myosin in chromosome movement. Anti-Asterias egg myosin, characterized by Mabuchi and Okuno (1977, J. Cell Biol., 74:251), completely and specifically inhibits the actin activated Mg++-ATPase of myosin in vitro and, when microinjected, inhibits cytokinesis in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that microinjected antibody has no observable effect on the rate or extent of anaphase chromosome movements. Neither central spindle elongation nor chromosomal fiber shortening is affected by doses up to eightfold higher than those required to uniformly inhibit cytokinesis in all injected cells. We calculate that such doses are sufficient to completely inhibit myosin ATPase activity in these cells.Cells injected with buffer alone, with myosin-absorbed antibody, or with nonimmune yglobulin, proceed normally through both mitosis and cytokinesis. Control y-globulin, labeled with fluorescein, diffuses to homogeneity throughout the cytoplasm in 2-4 rain and remains uniformly distributed. Antibody is not excluded from the spindle region. Prometaphase chromosome movements, fertilization, pronuclear migration, and pronuclear fusion are also unaffected by microinjected antimyosin.These experiments demonstrate that antimyosin blocks the actomyosin interaction thought to be responsible for force production in cytokinesis but has no effect on mitotic or meiotic chromosome motion. They provide direct physiological evidence that myosin is not involved in force production for chromosome movement.Anaphase chromosome movement in eucaryotes is usually the result of two distinct motions: the chromosomal fibers shorten as the chromosomes move toward the spindle poles, and the central spindle elongates as the poles move apart. These motions, which together insure the appropriate segregation of the daughter chromosomes during cell division, are likely the result of different force-producing mechanisms (4,5, 19,44,47). Because the spindle is labile, its ultrastructure is complex, and the actual force required to move the chromosomes is small (42, 54), a comprehensive catalog of the molecules responsible for force production in anaphase movement is not available. As a result, various theories that attempt to explain chromosomal fiber shortening and central spindle elongation have included virtually every known biological mechanochemical transducing system.