2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2010.5616046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of microstructure and processing parameters on mechanical strength of multicrystalline silicon solar cells

Abstract: Silicon wafer thickness reduction without increasing the wafer strength leads to a high breakage rate during subsequent handling and processing steps. Cracking of solar cells has become one of the major sources of solar module failure and rejection. Hence, it is important to evaluate the mechanical strength of solar cells and influencing factors. The purpose of this work is to understand the fracture behavior of silicon solar cells and to provide information regarding the bending strength of the cells. Triple … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristic strengths and Weibull moduli for these wafers are calculated and listed in Table 1. The overall characteristic strength of the mc-Si wafers is in the range of 141 to 164MPa, which is higher than the commonly published results [4,5,7,10]. The Weibull modulus of ~8 indicates good consistency among the wafers tested.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characteristic strengths and Weibull moduli for these wafers are calculated and listed in Table 1. The overall characteristic strength of the mc-Si wafers is in the range of 141 to 164MPa, which is higher than the commonly published results [4,5,7,10]. The Weibull modulus of ~8 indicates good consistency among the wafers tested.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In addition to kerf loss, the sawing process produces other defects such as surface roughening, surface and subsurface micro-cracks, local residual stress, phase transformation, among others [1]. The impact of these defects on the mechanical strength of silicon wafers has been studied by various authors from different viewpoints, including the effects of grit size, shape and distribution [2][3][4], wafer type and sawing orientation [5,6], crystallinity [7], post-sawing processes [8,9], and fracture mechanics-based prediction [10]. However, the majority of these studies are performed on full-size wafers or large samples, which tend to exacerbate the effect of wafer tapering commonly observed in as-sawn wafers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resonance ultrasonic vibration (RUV) [37,38] Scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) [37,38] Transmission electron microscopy [23,41] Angle polishing followed by defect etching [42] Insufficient saw damage removal Atomic force microscopy (AFM) [23,43] Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [23,41,44,45] Confocal microscopy [46][47][48] Optical profilometry [18] Compromised mechanical strength or excessive stress…”
Section: Cracking µ-Cracks Formed During Waferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical strength of a cell is dependent on the processing parameters and cell crystallinity. Four-point bending tests have been conducted on cell specimens of varying etching conditions during manufacturing, crystallinity, aluminum paste type and aluminum paste thickness [19]. From these studies, the bending tensile stresses at fracture in both aluminum paste and silicon is investigated and a range of values obtained.…”
Section: Stresses In Pv Module Under the Sunmentioning
confidence: 99%