2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of microstructure on the oxidative wear behavior of plain carbon steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) [32]. Here, the friction coefficient decreases [39,47] and converges to l & 1, which is comparable to the experimentally observed value for the dry sliding of steel surfaces [22,48], thus validating this surface model for the reproduction of experimental friction coefficients. Figure 4 shows the change in the friction behaviour when CNO and CND nanoparticles are present at various coverages when P z = 1.0 GPa.…”
Section: Effect Of Nanoparticle Coveragesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3) [32]. Here, the friction coefficient decreases [39,47] and converges to l & 1, which is comparable to the experimentally observed value for the dry sliding of steel surfaces [22,48], thus validating this surface model for the reproduction of experimental friction coefficients. Figure 4 shows the change in the friction behaviour when CNO and CND nanoparticles are present at various coverages when P z = 1.0 GPa.…”
Section: Effect Of Nanoparticle Coveragesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The resulting rise in temperature helps atmospheric oxidation over the wearing surface and formation of an oxide layer. This oxide layer gets removed by repeated and multiple contacts of pin asperities, and wear debris of oxide particles are generated . For SQ sample, due to the large and non‐uniformly distributed martensite particles (Figure ), the wear resistance of wearing surface is not uniform, as martensite is more resistance to wear in comparison with ferrite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all samples, the steady state friction curve has two parts: a first part with low friction coefficient and less fluctuations and a second part with higher friction coefficient and more fluctuations. The fluctuations in friction coefficient is caused by continuing process of removal of the oxide layer and its reformation and thickening . In the second part of friction coefficient curve, the fluctuations may also include the contribution resulting from the entrapment of wear debris between the sliding surfaces and activation of three‐body abrasion mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that a harder matrix held an oxide layer more firmly compared with a softer one, which complied with the reported researches. [23,24] The longitudinal cross-section observation of the worn surfaces identified that the extent of plastic deformation in subsurface matrix of the low-hardness-tempered sorbite was more severe than those of high-hardness-tempered martensite and tempered troostite. For example, within a load ranging from 150 to 300 N, the thickness of the plastically deformed region reached approximately 70 to 140 lm in the former but only 15 to 20 lm in the latter.…”
Section: B Wear Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%