2012
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201200019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Misorientation on the Compression of Highly Anisotropic Single‐Crystal Micropillars

Abstract: The effect of crystal misorientation, geometrical tilt, and contact misalignment on the compression of highly anisotropic single crystal micropillars was assessed by means of crystal plasticity finite element simulations. The investigation was focused in single crystals with the NaCl structure, like MgO or LiF, which present a marked plastic anisotropy as a result of the large difference in the critical resolved shear stress between the “soft” {110}〈110〉 and the “hard” {100}〈110〉 active slip systems. It was fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial loading slope of the stress-strain curves at 23 °C and 100 °C was much more compliant than that expected from purely elastic loading. This behavior was attributed to the local plastic yielding at the top of the micropillar, because of slight misalignments between the micropillar surface and the flat punch, before full contact is established between the two [37]. This effect is clearly seen in the variation in elastic modulus of the micropillar, determined from the slope of the unloading steps during the test, as a function of the applied displacement (Fig.…”
Section: Micropillar Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The initial loading slope of the stress-strain curves at 23 °C and 100 °C was much more compliant than that expected from purely elastic loading. This behavior was attributed to the local plastic yielding at the top of the micropillar, because of slight misalignments between the micropillar surface and the flat punch, before full contact is established between the two [37]. This effect is clearly seen in the variation in elastic modulus of the micropillar, determined from the slope of the unloading steps during the test, as a function of the applied displacement (Fig.…”
Section: Micropillar Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The total number of elements in the model was 15359 elements, following a mesh convergence analysis. The flat punch was modeled as a rigid body, with a lateral stiffness of 10 lN/nm, which approximately corresponds to the lateral stiffness of the indenter used in the experiment [37]. The contact between the flat punch and the micropillar head was modeled according to a Coulomb friction Table 1 Elastic constants of the cubic IN718 single crystal [21].…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of Micropillar Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact between the flat punch and the micropillar head was modeled according to a Coulomb friction Table 1 Elastic constants of the cubic IN718 single crystal [21]. model, with a friction coefficient of 0.1 [37]. The base of the supporting material was fully constrained, while a flat punch was moved in the vertical direction at a constant speed.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of Micropillar Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soler and Aldareguia show that misalignments induce significant changes in the flow stress of LiF micropillars. 165 In the case of NPs, Issa et al investigate the mechanical properties of MgO perfectly shaped h001i-nanocubes and emphasize the benefits of such geometry compared to the use of nanospheres (e.g., on the slip system analysis). 120 Setup alignment and sample orientation characterization are crucial to correctly measure mechanical properties and rigorously identify elementary processes of deformation.…”
Section: Crystal Misalignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%