2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Mn in ZnO using DFT calculations: Magnetic and electronic changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the choice of the U parameter requires detailed studies of its incidence in other properties of ZnO besides E g [24,25,27,30]. Based on its good performance in the pure compound, the DFT+U approach has also been proposed to model the case of ZnO doped with transition metals and lanthanide atoms [28,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. So, nowadays, investigations that combine experimental determinations and DFT+U predictions are quite common, because this combination allows a deeper understanding of the materials through the relation of the observed properties and the modelling of their origins [34,[36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the choice of the U parameter requires detailed studies of its incidence in other properties of ZnO besides E g [24,25,27,30]. Based on its good performance in the pure compound, the DFT+U approach has also been proposed to model the case of ZnO doped with transition metals and lanthanide atoms [28,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. So, nowadays, investigations that combine experimental determinations and DFT+U predictions are quite common, because this combination allows a deeper understanding of the materials through the relation of the observed properties and the modelling of their origins [34,[36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice parameters, obtained from the Rietveld refinement (Table 1), are found agreeable with that reported in the previous literature (a = 3.25 and c = 5.21 Å for ZnO NPs, a = 8.09 Å for ZnAl 2 O 4 NPs (Tangcharoen et al, 2019;Zak et al, 2011)). Moreover, the lattice parameters of the prepared ZnO nanoparticles are found larger than that of their bulk counterpart (a = 3.12 and c = 5.05 Å (Gallegos et al, 2019)), demonstrating that the lattice parameters have increased in the nanoscale (Fukuhara, 2003), subsequently, inducing microstrain in the crystalline lattice. Microstrains, which are very common in nanoparticles, are mainly caused by the high surface energy of the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Nanoparticles Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using Hubbard U correction to the Zn d-orbitals is an efficient and computationally low-cost way to correct for the serious underestimation of the bandgap and also set right the incorrect energy position of the d-states of the Zn atoms. The bandgap of ZnO calculated with one U parameter stay about 50% lower than the experimental value [8]. To accurately describe the electronic spectrum, two Hubbard corrections were selected the studied objects: for d-orbitals Zn (U d ) and p-orbitals O (U p ).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ZnO nanostructures have been often utilized as gas sensors for the detection of different gases such as NH 3 , NO, F 2 , O 2 and CO [4][5][6][7]. Usually doping ZnO with metal ions is used to modify its electronic and optical properties [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Also doping of non-metal ions and vacancy-defect formation is used for sensing applications to overcome low sensitivity of the substrate materials to manipulate their geometry in order to improve the electronic properties and the electron transport [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%