Effect of modified single‐wall carbon nanotubes on mechanical and morphological properties of thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites based on (polyamide 6)/(acrylonitrile butadiene rubber)

Naderi, Ghasem; Ghoreishy, Mir Hamid Reza; Moradi, Mojtaba

doi:10.1002/vnl.21451

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These high performance rubbers exhibit excellent abrasion/ adhesion resistance and superior mechanical properties for their wide range of applications. NBR is not crystallizable under high strain, and therefore the reinforcing fillers are generally incorporated to yield sufficiently high mechanical properties [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 ]. Chougule and Giese [ 93 ] reported significant mechanical reinforcing effects of CNT as compared with CB in NBR due to good dispersion and effective interaction.…”

Section: Mechanical Properties Of Rubber Nanocomposites Of Carbon mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Desai et al [ 109 ] observed co-continuous phase in TPU:NBR (50:50) blend, owing to uniformly dispersed phases. However, there exists limited work only on the carbon based hybrid fillers reinforced Polyamide 6/NBR/SWCNT [ 91 ]. NBR/PVC/SWCNT, [ 92 ] TPPU/XNBR/MWCNT, [ 110 ] EPDM/NBR/MWCNT [ 111 ], and hybrid filled TPU/NBR blend nanocomposites [ 112 , 113 , 114 ] MWCNTs filled thermoplastic polyurethane-urea (TPUU) and carboxylated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (XNBR) blend nanocomposites exhibited increased tensile modulus from about 9.90 to 45.3 MPa, at 3 wt % loading of CNT [ 110 ].…”

Section: Mechanical Properties Of Rubber Nanocomposites Of Carbon mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Nanocarbon Reinforced Rubber Nanocomposites: Detailed Insights about Mechanical, Dynamical Mechanical Properties, Payne, and Mullin Effects

Srivastava

Mishra

2018

Nanomaterials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reinforcing ability of the fillers results in significant improvements in properties of polymer matrix at extremely low filler loadings as compared to conventional fillers. In view of this, the present review article describes the different methods used in preparation of different rubber nanocomposites reinforced with nanodimensional individual carbonaceous fillers, such as graphene, expanded graphite, single walled carbon nanotubes, multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and hybrid fillers consisting combination of individual fillers. This is followed by review of mechanical properties (tensile strength, elongation at break, Young modulus, and fracture toughness) and dynamic mechanical properties (glass transition temperature, crystallization temperature, melting point) of these rubber nanocomposites. Finally, Payne and Mullin effects have also been reviewed in rubber filled with different carbon based nanofillers.

show abstract

Section: Mechanical Properties Of Rubber Nanocomposites Of Carbon mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mechanical Properties Of Rubber Nanocomposites Of Carbon mentioning

confidence: 99%

Nanocarbon Reinforced Rubber Nanocomposites: Detailed Insights about Mechanical, Dynamical Mechanical Properties, Payne, and Mullin Effects

Srivastava

Mishra

2018

Nanomaterials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Samples with various formulations (according to Table 2) was mixed at 240 C and 80 rpm for 7 min. 5,24 After melt-mixing the materials, they were dried for about 12 h at 80 C in an oven. The suitable samples for tests with the relevant standard size were molded by the hot press (Collin P 200 E-type) at 250 C for 6 min.…”

Section: Preparation Of the Nanocompositesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Localization of different types of organoclay montmorillonite in the compatibilized polyamide 6/carboxylated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber nanocomposites: Morphology and rheological properties

Azizli

Barghamadi

Rezaeeparto³

et al. 2021

J of Applied Polymer Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, nanocomposites based on polyamide 6/carboxylated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (PA6/XNBR) reinforced by the clay montmorillonite (OMMT) (Cloisite 20A and Cloisite 30B) were prepared by melt mixing. Glycidyl methacrylate-grafted XNBR (XNBR-g-GMA) compatibilizer was used for immiscible blends of PA6/XNBR. The results illustrated that OMMT wanted to be selectively present in the more hydrophilic PA6 phase. Also, by adding the XNBR-g-GMA compatibilizer and increasing OMMT content, tensile strength, rheological and dynamic mechanical properties of the nanocomposites improved. According to transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, a few layers of OMMT (Cloisite 20A) in the XNBR-g-GMA compatibilizer phase was observed. The results of X-ray diffractometry and TEM analyses demonstrated that the formation of intercalated or exfoliated structures for both types of OMMT nanocomposites. In end of all analysis was found PA6/XNBR reinforced by the Cloisite 30B could be substantially improved by adding XNBR-g-GMA as a compatibilizer when compared to those reinforced by Cloisite 20A.

show abstract

“…However, there exists limited work only on the carbon based hybrid fillers reinforced Polyamide 6/NBR/SWCNT. [91] NBR/PVC/SWCNT, [92] TPPU/XNBR/MWCNT, [110] EPDM/NBR/MWCNT [111] and hybrid filled TPU/NBR blend nanocomposites [112][113][114] MWCNTs filled thermoplastic polyurethane-urea (TPUU) and carboxylated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (XNBR) blend nanocomposites exhibited increased tensile modulus from about 9.90 to 45.3 MPa, at 3 wt% loading of CNT [110]. Hoikkanen et al, [111] Shang et al, [118] fabricated series of high temperature vulcanized silicone rubber (HTVSR)/MWCNTs nanocomposites with different CNT contents.…”

Section: Mechanical Properties Of Carbon Filler Incorporated Nbr and mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Nanocarbons Reinforced Rubber Nanocomposites: Detailed insights about Mechanical, Dynamical Mechanical Properties, Payne and Mullin Effects

Srivastava¹,

Mishra²

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reinforcing ability of the fillers results in significant improvements in properties of polymer matrix at extremely low filler loadings compared to conventional fillers. In view of this, present review article describes the different methods used in preparation of different rubber nanocomposites reinforced with nanodimensional individual carbonaceous fillers, such as graphene, expanded graphite, single walled carbon nanotubes, multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphite oxide, graphene oxide and hybrid fillers consisting combination of individual fillers. This is followed by review of mechanical properties (tensile strength, elongation at break, Young modulus, and fracture toughness) and dynamic mechanical properties (glass transition temperature, crystallization temperature, melting point) of these rubber nanocomposites. Finally, Payne and Mullin Effects have also been reviewed in rubber filled with different carbon based nanofillers.

show abstract

Effect of modified single‐wall carbon nanotubes on mechanical and morphological properties of thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites based on (polyamide 6)/(acrylonitrile butadiene rubber)

Cited by 10 publications

References 30 publications

Nanocarbon Reinforced Rubber Nanocomposites: Detailed Insights about Mechanical, Dynamical Mechanical Properties, Payne, and Mullin Effects

Nanocarbon Reinforced Rubber Nanocomposites: Detailed Insights about Mechanical, Dynamical Mechanical Properties, Payne, and Mullin Effects

Localization of different types of organoclay montmorillonite in the compatibilized polyamide 6/carboxylated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber nanocomposites: Morphology and rheological properties

Hybrid Nanocarbons Reinforced Rubber Nanocomposites: Detailed insights about Mechanical, Dynamical Mechanical Properties, Payne and Mullin Effects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About