The relationship between photosynthesis and translocation rate changes as affected by water stress intensity and stage of plant development was evaluated in cotton and sorghum, representing a C3 and a C4 photosynthetic type, respectively. Photosynthetic rates were reduced as midday leaf water potentials declined from -14 to -27 bars in both species. Sorghum maintained higher photosynthesis and translocation rates compared to cotton at comparable leaf water potentials; however, the rate of change per bar decline in water potential was greater in sorghum than in cotton. Photosynthetic rates were reduced with increasing water stress prior to any significant change in translocation rates suggesting that photosynthesis is the more sensitive of the two processes. Severe water stress, corresponding to leaf water potentials of -27 bars, did not completely inhibit either photosynthesis or translocation.Photosynthetic rate reductions due to increasing water stress have been observed in a variety of plant species. Stomatal effects are usually considered to be the first and major limitation to CO2 fixation, although inhibitions at the chloroplast level have been proposed (5, 10). Under semiarid field conditions, stomatal closure is not evident in fully illuminated cotton leaves even at Iw2 approaching -30 bars; however, photosynthesis is severely reduced (1, 2). In this same environment, stomatal regulation is observed only prior to flowering in sorghum's response to increasing water stress (1). Photosynthetic rates of individual leaves of sorghum are significantly reduced prior to any measurable increase in stomatal resistance. After the leaf has attained maximum size no evidence of stomatal closure exists in response to increasing water stress; however, photosynthetic rates are severely affected (12, and unpublished data of Krieg).Leaf photosynthesis may be affected by accumulation of photosynthate due to effects on translocation or utilization of the assimilate (16, 18). Inhibition of assimilate translocation by water stress has been observed in a number of plant species (6,7,11,13 Disagreement exists as to the relative sensitivity of photosynthesis and translocation to water stress. Several studies have concluded that translocation is more sensitive to water deficits than is photosynthesis (6, 7). In contrast to these conclusions, others (11,13,14,19,20) have suggested that photosynthesis is more sensitive to water stress than translocation. Wardlaw (19) has indicated that the effect of water stress on the translocation process is related to the availability of photosynthate more so than by a direct effect on the translocation process mechanism per se.The objective of this study was to define the relationship between leaf water status, photosynthesis, and translocation of current assimilate as a function of photosynthetic type (C3 versus C4) and growth stage.
MATERIALS AND METHODSSorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. SP 37) were chosen for study due to differences in photosynt...