2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinma.2020.100147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of molybdenum, aluminium and boron on the phase transformation in 4 ​wt.–% manganese steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the dilatometer experiments revealed that for the investigated medium manganese steel, the bainitic transformation was suppressed completely, even for slow cooling with t 8/5 >1 h, due to the alloying concept with 5 wt.% Mn and a relatively high 0.3 wt.% C. The decrease in hardness with slower cooling rates can be explained by self-tempering of martensite below M s . As suggested by Gramlich et al [23], the reduction in soluted C in the matrix due to the diffusion of C to lattice defects might be a reason for lower martensite hardness. The same effect was observed by Sackl et al [24] by atom-probe tomography analysis on 42CrMo4.…”
Section: Phase Transformations and Initial Statementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additionally, the dilatometer experiments revealed that for the investigated medium manganese steel, the bainitic transformation was suppressed completely, even for slow cooling with t 8/5 >1 h, due to the alloying concept with 5 wt.% Mn and a relatively high 0.3 wt.% C. The decrease in hardness with slower cooling rates can be explained by self-tempering of martensite below M s . As suggested by Gramlich et al [23], the reduction in soluted C in the matrix due to the diffusion of C to lattice defects might be a reason for lower martensite hardness. The same effect was observed by Sackl et al [24] by atom-probe tomography analysis on 42CrMo4.…”
Section: Phase Transformations and Initial Statementioning
confidence: 84%
“…The sample deformed at 500 °C exhibited a comparatively larger average grain size and a higher number fraction of grains with core–shell structure following partial recrystallization resulting in a slightly lower fraction of stabilized austenite and the formation of more FM. The average M s temperatures and stacking fault energies (SFE) of RA in various samples were estimated using the following equations [ 57 , 58 ]: M s = 517 − 423C − 30.4Mn − 7.5Si + 30Al SFE = 1.2 + 1.4 (Ni + 0.5Mn + 0.3Cu + 30C) + 0.6 (Cr + 2Si + 1.44B) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, the austenite stability can be approximated by Mnormals. In some empirical calculation formulae, [ 12,27–29 ] aluminum addition increases the Mnormals, thus it stabilizes the martensitic phase. This is what can be seen in the greater amounts of thermally induced martensite (Table 1) of aluminum‐containing MAS compared to aluminum‐free MAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%