2002
DOI: 10.5194/aab-45-181-2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of monensin sodium on fermentation efficiency in sheep rumen (short communication)

Abstract: Effect of monensin sodium on fermentation efficiency in sheep rumen (short communication) SummaryThe efficiency of rumen fermentation was studied in lambs and wethers using 14 experimental rations with and without monensin sodium. The 7 pairs of rations (the first a control diet, the second a monensin treated one) consisted of hay and concentrate at ratios of 60:40, 40:60, 100:0, 50:50 (lambs), 100:0, 75:25 and 50:50 (wethers), respectively. The molar % of acetic, propionic, butyric and valeric acids were take… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fermentation efficiency index (FE, expressed as a %) was calculated according to the equation: FE = (0.622 A + 1.092 P + 1.56 B) 100 / (A + P + 2 B) (Baran and Žitň an 2002) where A, P and B represent the molar proportions (mol%) of acetate, propionate and butate, respectively, in the total SCFA concentration.…”
Section: Calculations and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fermentation efficiency index (FE, expressed as a %) was calculated according to the equation: FE = (0.622 A + 1.092 P + 1.56 B) 100 / (A + P + 2 B) (Baran and Žitň an 2002) where A, P and B represent the molar proportions (mol%) of acetate, propionate and butate, respectively, in the total SCFA concentration.…”
Section: Calculations and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the value for co-supplementation was higher than that for Enz-supplementation by about 1% and higher than that calculated for control by about 2%. Calculation of fermentation efficiency is based on convertion of hexose energy to VFAs energy on the basis of equations worked out by Orskov (1975) and modified by Baran and Zitnan (2002). Metabolism of VFAs is less efficient than metabolism of glucose as more energy is used for formation of one mole of ATP (Livesey and Elia, 1995).…”
Section: Cecal Fermentation Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage concentrations of VFAs were analyzed using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC; Model Water 600; UV detector, Millipore Crop.) according to the method of Mathew et al (1997) Orskov (1975) and modified by Baran and Zitnan (2002): FE = (0.622a + 1.092p + 1.56b) 100/(a + p + 2b)…”
Section: Analytical Procedures For Samples Of Cecal Digestamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…according to the method of Mathew et al (1997). After the results of VFAs molar proportions had been received, the fermentation efficiencies (FE) were calculated on the basis of the equation worked out by Orskov (1975) and modified by Baran & Zitnan (2002): FE = (0.622a + 1.092p + 1.56b) 100/(a + p + 2b)…”
Section: Analytical Procedures For Samples Of Cecal Digestamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, addition of urea alone exerted a declining effect on fermentation efficiency by modifying cecal VFAs profile in the direction of increased acetate. Calculation of fermentation efficiency is based on convertion of hexose energy to VFAs energy on the basis of equations worked out by Orskov (1975) and modified by Baran & Zitnan (2002).…”
Section: Cecal Fermentation Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%