2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mulch and tillage system on soil porosity under wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding reveals that, compared to the control, fall-incorporated radish increased the proportion of flow-conducting, fine soil pores, those with diameters ≤ 0.75 mm (Table 3), at the soil surface. Głąb and Kulig (2008) also found that incorporated radish biomass increased the soil volume occupied by pores with diameters < 0.5 mm in a silt loam soil (Typic Argiustoll or FAO classed Luvic Chernozem).…”
Section: Radish Effects On Hydraulic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding reveals that, compared to the control, fall-incorporated radish increased the proportion of flow-conducting, fine soil pores, those with diameters ≤ 0.75 mm (Table 3), at the soil surface. Głąb and Kulig (2008) also found that incorporated radish biomass increased the soil volume occupied by pores with diameters < 0.5 mm in a silt loam soil (Typic Argiustoll or FAO classed Luvic Chernozem).…”
Section: Radish Effects On Hydraulic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Amendments can also reduce bulk density, alter soil pore size distributions, reduce a soil's susceptibility to erosion, and slow the formation of surface seals and crusts, thereby maintaining infiltration rates and thus delaying runoff (Bresson et al, 2001;Edmeades, 2003;Haynes & Naidu, 1998). Organic amendment effects on a soil's water-holding capacity (WHC) may or may not occur (Głąb and Kulig, 2008;MacRae and Mehuys, 1985). Adding organic matter may increase both the field capacity and permanent wilting point, resulting in little or no net change (Haynes & Naidu, 1998).…”
Section: Additional Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore network in NT soil is usually more continuous because of biopores by earthworms, root channels and vertical cracks (Cannel, 1985). In contrast, residue retention or incorporation improves edaphological environment (Anikwe et al, 2004(Anikwe et al, , 2007, moderates soil temperature (Sarkar & Singh, 2007;, increases soil porosity and water infiltration during intense rains (Gajri et al, 1994;Glab & Kulig, 2008), and reduces runoff and soil erosion (Bhatt & Khera, 2006;Prasad, 2014). Effects of tillage have been reported on penetration resistance, (Hermawan & Bomke, 1997) bulk density (Dao, 1993;Cetin et al, 2005;Ozpiner & Cay, 2005), infiltration characteristics (Azooz & Arshad, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porosity characteristics differ among tillage systems (Benjamin 1993) and nowadays, study on the soil porosity of different tillage treatment is one of the hotspots in tillage research. Previous researches showed that straw returning could increase the total porosity of soil (Lal et al 1980) while minimal and no tillage would decrease the soil porosity for aeration, but increase the capillary porosity; as a result, it enhances the water capacity of soil along with bad aeration of soil (Wang et al 1994, Glab andKulig 2008). However, Børresen (1999) found that the effects of tillage and straw treatments on the total porosity and porosity size distribution were not significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%