2021
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of multilayered groundwater mounds on water dynamics beneath a recharge basin: Numerical simulation and assessment of surface injection

Abstract: Interactions between groundwater mounds caused by a geologic layer contrast affect the efficiency of managed aquifer recharge in arid areas. However, research has rarely examined the roles of groundwater mounding size variations on soil water dynamics in a stratified vadose zone in response to a sustained infiltration source.Numerical experiments were conducted on a two-dimensional vertical-section domain using HYDRUS software to simulate the behaviours of two adjacent (upper and lower) groundwater mounds unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial values of the fitted parameters (Table 4) for each layer were estimated using the Neural Network Prediction embedded in the model, and then, the parameters were fitted by fitting the observations measured for this layer in the field test site. We compared observed field measurements with the results of the HYDRUS-1D simulations using the mean absolute errors (MAEs) and root mean square errors (RMSEs) shown in Table 5 [18,22]. The average value of the simulation data is very close to the average value of observed data at each layer.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Precipitation Infiltration In the Fi...mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial values of the fitted parameters (Table 4) for each layer were estimated using the Neural Network Prediction embedded in the model, and then, the parameters were fitted by fitting the observations measured for this layer in the field test site. We compared observed field measurements with the results of the HYDRUS-1D simulations using the mean absolute errors (MAEs) and root mean square errors (RMSEs) shown in Table 5 [18,22]. The average value of the simulation data is very close to the average value of observed data at each layer.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Precipitation Infiltration In the Fi...mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Cohesive soil water and solute transport studies not only consume a great deal of time but are also hard to do [11]. Various studies have attempted to use technologies such as hydrological geochemistry, stable isotopes, in situ monitoring, and numerical simulations to reveal the migration of soil moisture and the conversion relationships among rainfall, soil moisture, and groundwater [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. But almost all of these studies were located in arid and semi-arid areas with unconfined groundwater aquifers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HYDRUS has been used to evaluate many of these technologies. The most common application has been studies of the hydrological functioning of drywells (e.g., Glass et al, 2020;Helles & Mogheir, 2023;Moreno et al, 2023;Sasidharan et al, 2018Sasidharan et al, , 2019Sasidharan et al, , 2020Sasidharan et al, , 2021 and infiltration basins (e.g., Cannavo et al, 2018;Glass et al, 2020;Lu et al 2021;Nieec et al, 2021;Qi et al, 2021). The reservoir boundary condition in HYDRUS, for which the water level in a well or infiltration basin depends on the rate of water injection or pumping along with water infiltration or exfiltration, has most often been used in these applications (e.g., Glass et al, 2020;Sasidharan et al, 2018Sasidharan et al, , 2019.…”
Section: Managed Aquifer Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%