“…However, the XRD results confirmed that the crystallinity of sample C was higher than that of sample D, which may be caused by the surface of sample D being worse than that of sample C. The surface roughness of samples C and D were 3.5 and 7.7 nm, respectively, as measured by AFM (images not shown), whereas samples A and B had surface roughnesses of 132 and 98 nm, respectively. In addition, there were no cracks on the surface of all samples were observed, even though they all were grown at very high temperatures, which usually causes cracking during cooling because of thermally induced tensile stress 7 .…”