2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of multiple context exposure on renewal in spider phobia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
91
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
91
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11]13,22 It can provide standardized and controlled environments, and scenes can be repeated to achieve therapeutic goals. 23,24 Moreover, exposure to virtual environments bridges the gap between an imagined situation and a real one; it allows the patient to be exposed to anxiety-generating stimuli as if he or she were in a real situation. 25,26 When treating those with social phobia, live exposure is a more difficult procedure to perform, as social situations are variable and unpredictable, which makes building hierarchies for gradual and repeated exposure more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11]13,22 It can provide standardized and controlled environments, and scenes can be repeated to achieve therapeutic goals. 23,24 Moreover, exposure to virtual environments bridges the gap between an imagined situation and a real one; it allows the patient to be exposed to anxiety-generating stimuli as if he or she were in a real situation. 25,26 When treating those with social phobia, live exposure is a more difficult procedure to perform, as social situations are variable and unpredictable, which makes building hierarchies for gradual and repeated exposure more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, previous research has shown that fear extinction in multiple contexts results in less renewal of fear relative to extinction a single context (Shiban, Pauli, & Muhlberger, 2013;Vansteenwegen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a standard conditioned inhibition test may simply sort participants according to preferred strategy (first or second order) rather than measuring conditioned inhibition strength per se complicating analysis of the relationship between conditioned inhibition and other types of inhibition. (Shiban, Pauli, & Mühlberger, 2013;Shiban, Schelhorn, Pauli, & Muehlberger, 2015) and this effect could be mediated either through a reduction in protection from extinction or by increasing the number of stimulus elements that could exert occasion-setting control (Glautier et al, 2013 The relative values of the distributions is given at δ = 0 and the 95% Bayesian credible interval is given around the mean of the posterior distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%