2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of multiple factors on the adsorption of Cd in an alluvial soil from Xiba, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 5 B, cadmium concentrations generally declined with the decrease of SOM content. Ren et al (2020) [ 48 ] pointed out that after the removal of SOM, the cadmium adsorption capacity generally decreased. SOM has a large surface area and abundant oxygen-containing functional groups (carboxyl, phenolic, hydroxyl, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 5 B, cadmium concentrations generally declined with the decrease of SOM content. Ren et al (2020) [ 48 ] pointed out that after the removal of SOM, the cadmium adsorption capacity generally decreased. SOM has a large surface area and abundant oxygen-containing functional groups (carboxyl, phenolic, hydroxyl, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high concentration of Cd caused heavy metal pollution in the agricultural soils of the study area. Accordingly, long-term consumption of rice, vegetables, fruits, and water seriously polluted by Cd are likely to lead to chronic poisoning [ 54 , 55 ]. In addition, Cd has become the most serious heavy metal soil pollutant in China and substantially affects the quality and yield of crops [ 4 , 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the competitive adsorption of excessive free Na + and K + at greater zeolite dosages, which decreased the Cd(II) adsorption capacity of the soil (Zhou et al, 2003). Furthermore, K + has been reported to have a more negative effect on the Cd adsorption capacity of soils (Ren et al, 2020), which may explain the slight lower immobilization efficiency of sample 28 at a dosage of 6-8 wt.%.…”
Section: Cd(ii) Immobilization Potential Of Geopolymer-supported Zeolites In Paddy Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to a decrease in the cadmium adsorption capacity of soil itself caused by the competitive adsorption of excessive free Na + and K + when a higher zeolite dosage was used (Zhou et al, 2003). Furthermore, K + has been reported to have a more negative effect on the cadmium adsorption capacity of soil (Ren et al, 2020), which was responsible for the slight lower immobilization efficiency of sample 28 at 6-8 wt% addition. Fig.…”
Section: Cd(ii) Immobilization Potential Of Geopolymer-supported Zeolites In Paddy Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%