2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of multiple uncertain material properties on the response variability of in-plane and plate structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is nowadays generally recognized that an accurate prediction of the buckling behavior of shells requires a realistic description of all uncertainties involved in the problem and that such task is realizable only in the framework of a robust Stochastic Finite Element Method (SFEM) formulation that can efficiently and accurately handle geometric as well as physical nonlinearities of shell-type structures (Choi and Noh, 2000;Graham and Siragy, 2001;Argyris et al, 2002b;Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005;Stefanou and Papadrakakis, 2004;Lagaros and Papadopoulos, 2006;Noh, 2006;Onkar et al, 2006;Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007). The analysis of such structures has been carried out in a probabilistic context through the application of the Finite Element method in conjunction with the Monte Carlo Simulation, incorporating realistic descriptions of the uncertainties involved in geometric (Bielewicz and Górski, 2002;Schenk and Schuëller, 2003), material and thickness imperfections Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005), as well as boundary conditions (Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007;Schenk and Schuëller, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is nowadays generally recognized that an accurate prediction of the buckling behavior of shells requires a realistic description of all uncertainties involved in the problem and that such task is realizable only in the framework of a robust Stochastic Finite Element Method (SFEM) formulation that can efficiently and accurately handle geometric as well as physical nonlinearities of shell-type structures (Choi and Noh, 2000;Graham and Siragy, 2001;Argyris et al, 2002b;Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005;Stefanou and Papadrakakis, 2004;Lagaros and Papadopoulos, 2006;Noh, 2006;Onkar et al, 2006;Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007). The analysis of such structures has been carried out in a probabilistic context through the application of the Finite Element method in conjunction with the Monte Carlo Simulation, incorporating realistic descriptions of the uncertainties involved in geometric (Bielewicz and Górski, 2002;Schenk and Schuëller, 2003), material and thickness imperfections Papadrakakis, 2004, 2005), as well as boundary conditions (Papadopoulos and Iglesis, 2007;Schenk and Schuëller, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, stochastic fields f 2 (x, y) and f 3 (x, y) are assumed uncorrelated. However, since cross-correlation between the aforementioned fields has proven to play an important role on the buckling behavior of shell-type structures leading often to a further reduction of the bearing capacity, with respect to the uncorrelated case (Noh and Kwak, 2006;Noh, 2006;Stefanou and Papadrakakis, 2004), the effect of the above mentioned correlation in the optimum design of shell structures will be specifically addressed in follow-up research. The stochastic stiffness matrix of the shell element is derived using the local average method.…”
Section: Stochastic Stiffness Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Ellingwood [17] examined the effect of random material field characteristics on the instability of a simply supported beam on elastic foundation and a frame using perturbation technique. Noh [18] framed stochastic finite element analysis to investigate the effect of multiple uncertain material properties on the response variability of in-plane and plate structures with multiple uncertain material parameters. Keeping in mind the above aspect, in the present work, an HSDT-based probabilistic procedure as proposed by Lal et al [19] and Singh et al [20] is extended to random environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%