2022
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12060723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Ash on Microstructure and Hydration Mechanism of Geopolymer Composites

Abstract: The geopolymerization process is an appropriate way of disposing of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWIFA), and possesses the advantages of immobilizing the heavy metals and making full use of its pozzolanic properties in manufacturing green, cementitious materials. In this study, coal fly ash (FA) and metakaolin (MK) were used to prepare a geopolymer composite, with MK partially replaced by different proportions of MSWIFA through the alkali-activation method. The microstructure and hydration mech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geopolymerization process is an appropriate way of disposing of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWIFA). In Wang et al's [5] study, coal fly ash (FA) and metakaolin (MK) were used to prepare a geopolymer composite, with MK being partially replaced by different proportions of MSWIFA through the alkali-activation method. Their results showed that when the content of MSWIFA reached the maximum of 35%, the porosity and average pore diameter increased by 25% and 16%, respectively, compared with that without MSWIFA.…”
Section: Overview Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geopolymerization process is an appropriate way of disposing of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWIFA). In Wang et al's [5] study, coal fly ash (FA) and metakaolin (MK) were used to prepare a geopolymer composite, with MK being partially replaced by different proportions of MSWIFA through the alkali-activation method. Their results showed that when the content of MSWIFA reached the maximum of 35%, the porosity and average pore diameter increased by 25% and 16%, respectively, compared with that without MSWIFA.…”
Section: Overview Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic literature has emphasized the significance of reducing dependence on Portland cement as a crucial sustainability challenge within the construction sector. Consequently, prior research has dedicated considerable effort to identifying alternative or supplementary cementitious materials that can partially or completely substitute cement in civil engineering applications [ 2 , 3 ]. As a result, extensive research has been conducted to assess the viability of various typical industrial by-products, such as fly ash, glass, marble, coal-bottom ash, and others as partial replacements for Portland cement [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also the possibility of alkaline activation of other raw materials considered to be waste from mining, processing, and other industries, i.e., the energy industry. Examples of alkaline-activated raw materials that the researchers have used in their research include volcanic tuff [30,31], mine waste [32], or plasma waste [33][34][35]. Hypo slime (waste cellulose material from the paper industry) has proven to be a great alternative to replacing cement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%