1992
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mutations in a zinc-binding domain of yeast RNA polymerase C (III) on enzyme function and subunit association.

Abstract: The conserved amino-terminal region of the largest subunit of yeast RNA polymerase C is capable of binding zinc ions in vitro. By oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, we show that the putative zinc-binding motif present in the largest subunit of all eukaryotic and archaebacterial RNA polymerases, is essential for the function of RNA polymerase C. All mutations in the invariant cysteine and histidine residues conferred a lethal phenotype. We also obtained two conditional thermosensitive mutants affecting thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one explanation for the difference in effectiveness of blocking between these two antisera is that antibody against the C53 subunit is directed distal to the region accessed by the integration complex, potentially presenting less of an obstacle to pol III binding at the target site. The C53 subunit is reported to be more loosely associated with the pol III complex [39] so it is also possible that it is dislodged from the polymerase by its interaction with the antibody, leaving the remainder of the polymerase available to bind to the target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one explanation for the difference in effectiveness of blocking between these two antisera is that antibody against the C53 subunit is directed distal to the region accessed by the integration complex, potentially presenting less of an obstacle to pol III binding at the target site. The C53 subunit is reported to be more loosely associated with the pol III complex [39] so it is also possible that it is dislodged from the polymerase by its interaction with the antibody, leaving the remainder of the polymerase available to bind to the target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, several missense variants were found to disrupt this interaction [64,65], suggesting that clustering of deleterious variants at solvent-exposed amino acid residue positions is indeed a useful indicator of binding site location. There is a large literature on the general topic of the relationship between deleterious mutations and binding sites [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Binding Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third subcomplex has partial structural similarity to TFIIE (Geiger et al 2010;Lefevre et al 2011). In Pol III, this subcomplex, which is detachable from the rest of the enzyme (Werner et al 1992(Werner et al , 1993Wang and Roeder 1997), contains the subunits POLR3C (RPC3/ RPC62) and POLR3F (RPC6/RPC39), with structural similarities to GTF2E1 (TFIIE-A) and GTF2E2 (TFIIE-B), respectively, as well as the subunit POLR3G (RPC7/RPC32-alpha), the only polymerase subunit without an identified counterpart in the other two transcription machineries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%