Molecular Mechanisms for Repair of DNA 1975
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2898-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Mutations in lig and polA on UV-Induced Strand Cutting in a uvrC Strain of Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extra ligase would not be expected to have any effect on uvr-J, which is defective in the specific UV endonuclease (13). This hypothesis is in accord with the report that ligase in E. coli can seal the nicks made by the UV endonuclease * before the dimers have been released (11). In wild-type E. coli, the fact that extra ligase does not change UV sensitivity l (1) may be because the uvrC+ product prevents sealing of 10 20O…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The extra ligase would not be expected to have any effect on uvr-J, which is defective in the specific UV endonuclease (13). This hypothesis is in accord with the report that ligase in E. coli can seal the nicks made by the UV endonuclease * before the dimers have been released (11). In wild-type E. coli, the fact that extra ligase does not change UV sensitivity l (1) may be because the uvrC+ product prevents sealing of 10 20O…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Although studies of UV-induced DNA strand breakage in the mutants have consistently shown that uvrA+ and uvrB+ gene functions are essential for the endonucleolytic event initiating repair (10,17,22), conflicting reports have been published with respect to the role of the uvrC' gene in the same process. Some reports indicate that the uvrC' gene function is involved in the actual incision reaction (2,17,18,22), whereas others point to a role for the uvrC' function in a succeeding preex'cision step (10,19,20). In view of this confusion, we reexamined the role of the uvrC function in the incision of UV-irradiated DNA, both in vitro and in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the extent of incision is still limited compared to wild-type strains, and does not exceed the level normally seen in uvrC cells after prolonged incubation. In these respects, the behaviour of the uvrC34 lexA5l strain is very similar to that of a uvrC34 lig-7(Ts) strain, provided the latter has been incubated at the non-permissive temperature for at least 60 min (Seeberg & Rupp, 1975). This similarity might well be a reflection of the effective induction of SOS functions by ligase inactivation (Morse & Pauling, 1975).…”
Section: Sos Dependence Of Incision In Uurc34 Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…If ligase is inactivated in intact cells by the introduction of a lig-7(Ts) mutation and preincubation at the non-permissive temperature, the initial rate (but not the final level) of postirradiation incision is increased in uvrC mutants (Seeberg & Rupp, 1975 (Seeberg et al, 1980). Ligase inactivation leads to efficient induction of the SOS regulon (Morse & Pauling, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%