2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-019-04514-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nano-SiO2 and surfactants on the oil-water interfacial properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studying the response of the interfacial layer to compression and dilatation could provide additional information beyond the IFT measurements. Specifically, it can provide information regarding how the particles are assembled at the interface and the “strength” of the interfacial layer. , Figure A shows the equilibrium dilatational modulus at different pHs. At pH 2, there are no significant changes to the interfacial modulus from that in pure water, irrespective of the concentration used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the response of the interfacial layer to compression and dilatation could provide additional information beyond the IFT measurements. Specifically, it can provide information regarding how the particles are assembled at the interface and the “strength” of the interfacial layer. , Figure A shows the equilibrium dilatational modulus at different pHs. At pH 2, there are no significant changes to the interfacial modulus from that in pure water, irrespective of the concentration used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing the change in material surface wettability is crucial as it relates to the interaction between the material and the rock surface in subsurface environments. In some studies, the reduction in wettability angle after using nanosilica materials ranges between 20 • and 60 • , demonstrating significant improvement in wettability [52][53][54][55]. Additionally, Hendraningrat and Torsaeter achieved a change in contact angle from 54 • to 21 • using metal oxides such as TiO 2 .…”
Section: Materials Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pastes with SS and CTAB, the adsorption of emulsifier molecule at the oil-water interface between the aluminosilicate particles and the oil droplet surface would decrease the oil-water interfacial tension and the required energy for emulsification, which results in the decreased size of emulsion droplets and the average pore sizes in the geopolymers. It is worth noting that compared to the anionic surfactant SS, the cationic surfactant CTAB shows a stronger ability to reduce the oil-water interface tension [33], resulting in a smaller average pore size. Unlike the SS or CTAB, the addition of PAM does not bring about significant changes to the interfacial tension, the pore size of PAM is closely related to the size of solid particles.…”
Section: The Pore Structure Of Geopolymermentioning
confidence: 99%