Effect of New Methods for Inhibiting Malolactic Fermentation on the Analytical and Sensory Parameters of Wines

Kiwi wine (KW) is tipically made by fermenting juice from peeled kiwifruit, resulting in the disposal of peel and pomace as by-products. However, the peel contains various beneficial compounds, like phenols and flavonoids. Since the peel is edible and rich in these compounds, incorporating it into the fermentation process of KW presents a potential solution to minimize by-product waste. This study compared the aroma and taste profiles of KW from peeled (PKW) and unpeeled (UKW) kiwifruits by combining intelligent sensory technology, GC-MS, and 1H-NMR. Focusing on aroma profiles, 75 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified in KW fermented with peel, and 73 VOCs in KW without peel, with 62 VOCs common to both. Among these compounds, rose oxide, D-citronellol, and bornylene were more abundant in UKW, while hexyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, and 2,4,5-trichlorobenzene were significantly higher in PKW. For taste profiles, E-tongue analysis revealed differences in the taste profiles of KW from the two sources. A total of 74 molecules were characterized using 1H-NMR. UKW exhibited significantly higher levels of tartrate, galactarate, N-acetylserotonin, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxymandelate, fumarate, and N-acetylglycine, along with a significantly lower level of oxypurinol compared to PKW. This study seeks to develop the theoretical understanding of the fermentation of kiwifruit with peel in sight of the utilization of the whole fruit for KW production, to increase the economic value of kiwifruit production.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Aroma and Taste Profiles of Kiwi Wine Fermented with/without Peel by Combining Intelligent Sensory, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, and Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Zhou,

Liu,

Lan

et al. 2024

Effects of Heterologous Expression of Genes Related L–Malic acid Metabolism in Saccharomyces uvarum on Flavor Substances Production in Wine

Li,

Song,

Wang

et al. 2024

During malolactic fermentation (MLF) of vinification, the harsh L–malic acid undergoes transformation into the milder L–lactic acid, and via decarboxylation reactions it is catalyzed by malolactic enzymes in LAB. The use of bacterial malolactic starter cultures, which usually present challenges in the industry as the suboptimal conditions after alcoholic fermentation (AF), including nutrient limitations, low temperatures, acidic pH levels, elevated alcohol, and sulfur dioxide concentrations after AF, lead to “stuck” or “sluggish” MLF and spoilage of wines. Saccharomyces uvarum has interesting oenological properties and provides a stronger aromatic intensity than Saccharomyces cerevisiae in AF. In the study, the biological pathways of deacidification were constructed in S. uvarum, which made the S. uvarum carry out the AF and MLF simultaneously, as different genes encoding malolactic enzyme (mleS or mleA), malic enzyme (MAE2), and malate permease (melP or MAE1) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Lactococcus lactis, Oenococcus oeni, and Lactobacillus plantarum were heterologously expressed. For further inquiry, the effect of L–malic acid metabolism on the flavor balance in wine, the related flavor substances, higher alcohols, and esters production, were detected. Of all the recombinants, the strains WYm1SN with coexpression of malate permease gene MAE1 from S. pombe and malolactic enzyme gene mleS from L. lactis and WYm1m2 with coexpression of gene MAE1 and malate permease gene MAE2 from S. pombe could reduce the L–malic acid contents to about 1 g/L, and in which the mutant WYm1SN exhibited the best effect on the flavor quality improvement.

Research on Engineering the Saccharomyces uvarum for Constructing a High Efficiency to Degrade Malic Acid and Low Yield of Diacetyl Biosynthesis Pathway

Li,

Song,

et al. 2024

Diacetyl is a flavor compound in wine with a low threshold (1–2 mg/L). It is produced during alcoholic fermentation (AF) Saccharomyces and malolactic fermentation (MLF) initiated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Whereas, the environment after AF suppresses the normal metabolism of LAB after AF. Researchs have shown the influence on diacetyl mechanisms of the genes ILV2, ILV6, ILV3, ILV5, BDH1, BDH2, and gene aldB from Lactobacillus plantarum in Saccharomyce uvarum WY1. While we found that the diacetyl contents produced by mutants after MLF (Co-fermentation and Seq-fermentation) were significantly improved compared to AF alone. Moreover, the genes mae1 and mae2 from S. pombe, and gene mleS from L. lactis exhibited significant effect on deacidification in our previous study, but the diacetyl of the mutants showed obvious improvement in this study. Thus the effects of association mutation of genes (ILV2, ILV6, ILV3, ILV5, BDH1, BDH2, aldB, mae1, and mleS) on deacidification, diacetyl and other flavors (organic acids, higher alcohols and esters) metabolism in S. uvarum after AF were detected in the study. Among all the mutants, strains V6AmS, V635mS, and V6B12mS showed the most favorable results. Specifically, the L-malic acid contents decreased to 1.26 g/L, 1.18 g/L, and 1.19 g/L, respectively. Concurrently, diacetyl levels were reduced by 52.56%, 61.84%, and 65.31%. The production of n-propanol increased by 18.84%, 20.89%, and 28.12%, whereas isobutanol levels decreased by 37.01%, 42.36%, and 44.04%, and isoamyl alcohol levels decreased by 19.28%, 19.79%, and 16.74%, compared to the parental strain WY1. Additionally, the concentration of lactate ester in the wine increased to 13.162 mg/L, 14.729 mg/L, and 14.236 mg/L, respectively.