Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
SUMMARY A trial has been conducted of the following methods for the reduction of serum cholesterol level in patients with atherosclerosis: (i) The use of a low‐fat, low‐cholesterol diet with the addition of corn oil; (ii) the exhibition of triparanol (0·25 to 0·5 gramme per day); (iii) the administration of nicotinic acid (up to 3 grammes per day); (iv) the administration of a combination of nicotinic acid and triparanol. The results were as follows. With the dietetic method, a fall in plasma cholesterol level usually occurred. However, this was only of very modest degree (mean of 42 mg. per 100 ml. in 10 patients). Although a proportion of the patients treated by diet considered that their vascular symptoms were relieved, this could not be confirmed by step tests or by clinical examination. When triparanol was used, significant lowering of the plasma cholesterol level (determined by the Bloor method) was observed in 17 of 22 patients treated for six months (mean lowering, 69 mg. per 100 ml.). Desmosterol accumulated in the plasma, and the true lowering of the cholesterol level was somewhat greater than this; the lowering of the total plasma sterol levels was somewhat less. We were unable to demonstrate desmosterol in the intimas of patients treated with triparanol. Treatment was not associated with any clinical benefit, nor were there any side effects which could be attributed to the drug. The administration of nicotinic acid was associated with a moderate lowering of the plasma cholesterol level (mean of 38 mg. per 100 ml. in 10 patients). Although a few patients said that they had experienced clinical benefit, this was of doubtful significance. Side effects were common and prevented the administration of a full dose in most cases. No toxicity was demonstrated. The use of a combination of nicotinic acid and triparanol produced an additional fall in the plasma cholesterol level (mean of 60 mg. per 100 ml. in nine patients). The addition of triparanol treatment to nicotinic acid treatment also produced an additional fall (mean of 44 mg. per 100 ml. in five patients). These findings are discussed, and it is concluded that it is possible to lower the plasma cholesterol level by diet or drug treatment, but that this is not of great clinical value if it is employed for a relatively short period or in the treatment of elderly patients. Treatment is more likely to be of value in younger men with early atherosclerosis or a raised plasma cholesterol level, but, as treatment must be carried on over many years, the method used must be devoid of serious toxicity.
SUMMARY A trial has been conducted of the following methods for the reduction of serum cholesterol level in patients with atherosclerosis: (i) The use of a low‐fat, low‐cholesterol diet with the addition of corn oil; (ii) the exhibition of triparanol (0·25 to 0·5 gramme per day); (iii) the administration of nicotinic acid (up to 3 grammes per day); (iv) the administration of a combination of nicotinic acid and triparanol. The results were as follows. With the dietetic method, a fall in plasma cholesterol level usually occurred. However, this was only of very modest degree (mean of 42 mg. per 100 ml. in 10 patients). Although a proportion of the patients treated by diet considered that their vascular symptoms were relieved, this could not be confirmed by step tests or by clinical examination. When triparanol was used, significant lowering of the plasma cholesterol level (determined by the Bloor method) was observed in 17 of 22 patients treated for six months (mean lowering, 69 mg. per 100 ml.). Desmosterol accumulated in the plasma, and the true lowering of the cholesterol level was somewhat greater than this; the lowering of the total plasma sterol levels was somewhat less. We were unable to demonstrate desmosterol in the intimas of patients treated with triparanol. Treatment was not associated with any clinical benefit, nor were there any side effects which could be attributed to the drug. The administration of nicotinic acid was associated with a moderate lowering of the plasma cholesterol level (mean of 38 mg. per 100 ml. in 10 patients). Although a few patients said that they had experienced clinical benefit, this was of doubtful significance. Side effects were common and prevented the administration of a full dose in most cases. No toxicity was demonstrated. The use of a combination of nicotinic acid and triparanol produced an additional fall in the plasma cholesterol level (mean of 60 mg. per 100 ml. in nine patients). The addition of triparanol treatment to nicotinic acid treatment also produced an additional fall (mean of 44 mg. per 100 ml. in five patients). These findings are discussed, and it is concluded that it is possible to lower the plasma cholesterol level by diet or drug treatment, but that this is not of great clinical value if it is employed for a relatively short period or in the treatment of elderly patients. Treatment is more likely to be of value in younger men with early atherosclerosis or a raised plasma cholesterol level, but, as treatment must be carried on over many years, the method used must be devoid of serious toxicity.
Many of the most commonly used drugs precede techniques for target identification and drug specificity and were developed on the basis of efficacy and safety, an approach referred to as classical pharmacology and, more recently, phenotypic drug discovery. Although substantial gains have been made during the period of focus on target-based approaches, particularly in oncology, these approaches have suffered a high overall failure rate and lower productivity in terms of new drugs when compared with phenotypic approaches. This review considers the importance of target identity and biology in clinical practice from the prescriber's viewpoint. In evaluating influences on prescribing behavior, studies suggest that target identity and mechanism of action are not significant factors in drug choice. Rather, patients and providers consistently value efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Similarly, the Food and Drug Administration requires evidence of safety and efficacy for new drugs but does not require knowledge of drug target identity or target biology. Prescribers do favor drugs with novel mechanisms, but this preference is limited to diseases for which treatments are either not available or suboptimal. Thus, while understanding of drug target and target biology is important from a scientific perspective, it is not particularly important to prescribers, who prioritize efficacy and safety.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.