2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859605005551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-blasting resistance in rice

Abstract: The development of rice blast disease in four slow-blasting (SB) genotypes was compared with that in the fast-blasting (FB) genotype Karuna, under natural field epidemics over a period of 3 years at five levels of nitrogen, in order to determine if the application of high doses of nitrogen influenced the expression of disease progress in the SB types. The treatment effects were compared through estimation of nine parameters viz. (i) lesion number (LN); (ii) area under disease progress curve (AUDPC); (iii) rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several measures for evaluating plant disease resistance have been advocated for use in identification of slowblasting resistance in rice, including single-point, or multi-point assessments, AUDPC, RAUDPC, r, k and number of lesions (Mohapatra 2002;Mukherjee et al 2005). However multiple data point assessment methods involve recording observations at regular intervals during the epidemic and thus are time consuming, labour intensive and expensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several measures for evaluating plant disease resistance have been advocated for use in identification of slowblasting resistance in rice, including single-point, or multi-point assessments, AUDPC, RAUDPC, r, k and number of lesions (Mohapatra 2002;Mukherjee et al 2005). However multiple data point assessment methods involve recording observations at regular intervals during the epidemic and thus are time consuming, labour intensive and expensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AUDPC and logistic apparent infection rates calculated by the AP and TP methods as well as the Gompertz apparent infection rates calculated by the TP method were superior to the Gompertz apparent infection rate calculated by the AP method. Previous reports revealed the superiority of AUDPC AP and 'r AP ' over many other parameters for evaluation of slow-blasting resistance in rice (Mohapatra 2002;Mukherjee et al 2005;Mohapatra et al 2008). The superiority of AUDPC AP and r AP in the present investigation corroborates these previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irrigated rice has a high nitrogen (N) demand (Carlos et al 2016;Saha et al 2019;Zhang et al 2019), and this has a great influence on plant-host relationship (Walters and Bingham 2007), mainly for the Magnaporthe oryzae x rice pathosystem, in which the phenomenon known as Ninduced susceptibility (NIS) occurs. Briefly, this N-induced susceptibility is characterized by the increase of leaf lesions and the alteration of types of lesions caused by the rice blast due to the increase in the amount of N (Otani 1959;Mukherjee et al 2005;Talukder et al 2005;Ballini et al 2013;Huang et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen-Induced Susceptibility (NIS) is characterized by an increase in lesion number (Otani, 1959 ; Mukherjee et al, 2005 ; Talukder et al, 2005 ; Ballini et al, 2013 ) and a change in the type of lesions (Otani, 1959 ; Matsuyama and Dimond, 1973 ), suggesting that the cellular events associated with pathogen growth are affected. However, there has been no analysis at the cytological level of the events associated with this increase in lesion number or size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%