Effect of Nitrogen Levels and Its Time of Application on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Dubey, Sriman Narayan; Tiwari, Abhishek; Singh, Vivek; Pandey, Vinay Kumar; Singh, Ghanshyam

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.205

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Shafi et al (2011), Jankovic et al (2011), Seadh et al(2017, Dubey et al(2018) and Kassie and Tesfadye (2019). Meanwhile, Mengistu and Abera (2014) and Terefe et al (2018) reported that 1000 seed of malt barley weights had a linear and negative response to N fertilizer rates and exhibited non-significant difference among control and the rest of applied N treatments.…”

Section: Nitrogen Fertilization Effectsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Similarly , Shafi et al (2011) reported that nitrogen applied at the rate of 60 kg/ ha resulted in maximum grains/ spike. In this direction similar conclusion were obtained bySafina (2010), Seadh et al (2017), Dubey et al(2018) and Terefe et al (2018).…”

Section: Nitrogen Fertilization Effectsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…O ، Donovan et al (2011), Jankovic et al (2011), Shafi et al (2011), Tigre et al, (2014), Gezahegn and Kefadle (2016), and Seadh et al (2017 found that, grain yield of barley, grain weight, and tillers /plant were increased by increasing N rate. Dubey et al (2018), Morsy et al (2018), Niguse and Kassaye (2018) and Terefe et al (2018), demonstrated that, maximum values of number of spikelets/spike No. of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight of barley were recorded with 60 kg N/ha They added that grain application of yield successively increased with increase in nitrogen level from 0 to 60 kg N/ha.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer, Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Fertilization on Barley Yield Under Sinai Conditions

Hassan

Sarhan

Gaballah

et al. 2021

Journal of Productivity and Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This investigation aimed to find out the effect of chemical nitrogen fertilizer levels (15, 30,45 and 60 kg N/fad.), barley seeding rate (40,60 and 80 kg/fad.) and nanofertilizer application on yield and its components of barley. The spiltspilt plot design as a form of the randomized complete block design with three replications was followed.Application of nano-fertilizer appeared to produce high values in No. of both spike lets and grains per spike as well as the heavy grains/spike, 1000-grain weight and, increased grain yield/fad. Seeding rate of 80 kg/fad. appeared to produce the highest value in each of number of spikes/m 2 and grain yield/fad. Meanwhile, the seeding rate of 40 kg/fad. recorded the highest value in each of No. of both spike lets and grains per spike, weight of both grains/spike and 1000-grain . Nitrogen fertilization was very effective on all yield characteristics, so any increase in N levels was followed by a significant increase in each of No of spike lets/spike, grains/spike and spikes/m 2 , also increased weight of both grains/spike and 1000-grain weight and grain yield per fa.Conclusively, these results finally recommend sowing barley with dense seeding rate of 80 kg/fad. and application of 60 kg N/ fad. In addition to application of nano-fertilizer to maximize grain yield /fad. under the experimental site and other likely environmental conditions.

show abstract

Section: Nitrogen Fertilization Effectsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Nitrogen Fertilization Effectsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer, Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Fertilization on Barley Yield Under Sinai Conditions

Hassan

Sarhan

Gaballah

et al. 2021

Journal of Productivity and Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to higher performance of growth attributing character which increase yield attributing characters of crop. Further Similar results were also validated by Dubey et al (2018) they reported that the higher growth attributes were recorded under nitrogen scheduling (T2 -1/3 at sowing and 2/3 after first irrigation) which was significantly superior over rest of the treatments. The minimum value of yield attributing characters was recorded with the nitrogen scheduling asN1-½ Basal + ¼ at 4WAS + ¼ at 8 WAS because sufficient amount of N was not available due to maximum losses of nitrogen resulted reduced translocation of photosynthates which was responsible for poor yield attributing characters.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 75%

Response of nitrogen scheduling and weed management on growth and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Bhagat,

Kumar,

Kaur

et al. 2023

ECJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A field experiment was conducted to study response of nitrogen scheduling and weed management on growth and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at the Experimental Farm, Mata Gujri College, Shri Fatehgarh Sahib during Rabi season of year 2018-2020. The experiment laid out in Split Plot Design (SPD) with three replications. The nitrogen scheduling includes N1 -½ Basal + ¼ at 4WAS + ¼ at 8 WAS, N2 -⅓ at 4 WAS + ⅓ at 8 WAS + ⅓ at 10 WAS, N3 -¼ at 4 WAS + ¼ at 6 WAS + ¼ at 8 WAS + ¼ at 10 WAS while weed management treatment were W2 -clodinafop @ 60 g/ha, W3 -sulfosulfuron @ 25 g/ha, W4-carfentrazone @ 20g/ha along with weed free and weedy check. The results revealed that the maximum growth and yield attributes were recorded of N3 -¼ at 4 WAS + ¼ at 6 WAS + ¼ at 8 WAS + ¼ at 10 WAS which was at par N2 -⅓ at 4 WAS + ⅓ at 8 WAS + ⅓ at 10 WAS and found significantly superior over N1-½ Basal + ¼ at 4WAS + ¼ at 8 WAS.N3 -¼ at 4 WAS + ¼ at 6 WAS + ¼ at 8 WAS + ¼ at 10 WAS + W3 -sulfosulfuron @ 25 g/ha recorded significantly maximum which was significantly superior over all the treatments.

show abstract

“…There were differences in leaf area, but the statistical analysis did not prove significant differences either among the varieties or among the N fertilization rates any time during the course of our research. These statements do not correspond to other studies, for example Dubey (2017) found that N treatment increased significantly the leaf area index (LAI) of barley [42].…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 67%

Photosynthetic and Agronomic Traits of Winter Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We tested six winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in a small plot field experiment, measuring photosynthesis and other parameters three times during the growing season. Four genotypes—Andoria, Jakubus, Paradies and Zophia—are new, promising varieties with requirements of intensive technology, high yield potential and very good disease resistance. The two popular Hungarian varieties (KG Apavár and KG Puszta) are relatively old but they have good tolerance to extreme ecological conditions and outstanding resistance and winter hardiness. The aim of our research was to test the new varieties’ performance. Several recent studies found close connections among various photosynthetic parameters in barley, and we confirmed that in our research. There were significant differences between the varieties in the assimilation rate—the highest values were measured at the BBCH 47–49 stage (end of booting), except Jakubus and Zophia, where the highest values were at BBCH 73–75 (milk ripe). The cultivars’ response to irradiation change varied, especially at higher photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) levels. In April and May, the plants were in drought stress according to the intercellular CO2 level and the total conductance to carbon dioxide. The differences between the air and leaf temperature were also low, indicating water stress, but the assimilation rate was relatively high (9.07–14.09 µmol m−2 s−1).We found a close connection between normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) values and grain protein content in each of the tested barley cultivars. The correlation was significant, at p = 0.01 level. The protein yield per hectare was determined rather by grain yield than protein content. The relationship between the NDVI values and grain yield was moderate, but NDVI values and protein content are in strong correlation.

show abstract

Effect of Nitrogen Levels and Its Time of Application on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Cited by 5 publications

References 1 publication

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer, Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Fertilization on Barley Yield Under Sinai Conditions

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer, Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Fertilization on Barley Yield Under Sinai Conditions

Response of nitrogen scheduling and weed management on growth and yield attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Photosynthetic and Agronomic Traits of Winter Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About