2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Noise on Vocal Loudness and Pitch in Natural Environments: An Accelerometer (Ambulatory Phonation Monitor) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast with recent findings by Yiu and Yip. 17 In a laboratory experiment, those authors investigated the effects of different background noise conditions on healthy speakers' voice during a 3-to 5-minute monologue with the use of an APM. Irrespective of gender, high background noise levels were associated with F0…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast with recent findings by Yiu and Yip. 17 In a laboratory experiment, those authors investigated the effects of different background noise conditions on healthy speakers' voice during a 3-to 5-minute monologue with the use of an APM. Irrespective of gender, high background noise levels were associated with F0…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, background noise level may also influence vocal loading, as it automatically causes speakers to increase their voice SPL and F0 or modulate spectral aspects. 16,17 workday. This allows one to present an authentic picture of both professional and extra-professional vocal demands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High noise levels around and above 70 dBA are common in many communicationand vocally-demanding workplaces such as schools and preschools (Shield et al, 2015;Sjödin, Kjellberg, Knutsson, Landström, & Lindberg, 2012). To enhance the audibility of the voice in loud environmental noise, the speaker typically increases the voice SPL, along with increased fo which may result in hyperfunction (Garnier & Henrich, 2014;Hillman et al, 1989;Holmberg et al, 2003;Södersten et al, 2005;Titze, 1989a;Yiu & Yip, 2016). A systematic review by Cantor Cutiva et al (2013) revealed that high environmental noise levels, and the use of high voice SPL, are among the most common risk factors for voice disorders in teachers.…”
Section: Environmental Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activity noise disturbs speech communication and may interfere with performance and wellbeing (Astolfi & Pellerey, 2008;Banbury & Berry, 2005;Lundquist, Holmberg, & Landström, 2000;Shield & Dockrell, 2008). To maintain speech intelligibility, and to avoid the speaker having to increase voice SPL, conversation should be kept below 50-55 dBA (Yiu & Yip, 2016). Increased voice SPL is required at 70 dBA, and at 80-85 dBA the speaker must shout to be heard at 1 meter (Arlinger, 1999; The Swedish Work Environment Authority's provisions for noise, AFS 2005:16).…”
Section: Environmental Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lombard speech generally refers to several modifications to vocal characteristics (e.g., changes in loudness, pitch, and spectral tilt) in the context of elevated background noise levels. These effects have been observed in controlled laboratory settings and naturalistic settings that are known to induce Lombard speech [6,[12][13][14][15]. Characterizing background noise levels and Lombard speech in naturalistic environments is of critical importance to clinical voice assessment using ambulatory monitoring technology.…”
Section: The Lombard Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%