2007
DOI: 10.1002/num.20225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of numerical integration in the DGFEM for nonlinear convection‐diffusion problems

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the effect of numerical integration applied to the discontinuous Galerkin finite element discretization of nonlinear convection-diffusion problems in 2D. In the space semidiscretization the volume and line integrals are evaluated by numerical quadratures. Our goal is to estimate the error caused by the numerical integration and to show what numerical quadratures guarantee that the accuracy of the method with exact integration is preserved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In , the truncation error of numerical integrations is analyzed for the semi‐discrete DG method for nonlinear conservation laws with sufficiently smooth u and boldf , under the assumption that the quadrature rules over the elements and edges are exact for polynomials of degree ( 2 k ) and ( 2 k + 1 ) , respectively. Recently, in , the authors discussed the effects of quadratures in DG method for nonlinear convection‐diffusion equations in 2D and 3D cases. We remark that the estimates in could not be applied to the pure convection case (i.e., nonlinear conservation laws), since the constant in their estimates would blow up as the diffusion coefficient tends to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , the truncation error of numerical integrations is analyzed for the semi‐discrete DG method for nonlinear conservation laws with sufficiently smooth u and boldf , under the assumption that the quadrature rules over the elements and edges are exact for polynomials of degree ( 2 k ) and ( 2 k + 1 ) , respectively. Recently, in , the authors discussed the effects of quadratures in DG method for nonlinear convection‐diffusion equations in 2D and 3D cases. We remark that the estimates in could not be applied to the pure convection case (i.e., nonlinear conservation laws), since the constant in their estimates would blow up as the diffusion coefficient tends to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We emphasize that a similar technical assumption would be needed for DG-FEM with other types of variational crimes, e.g., when the advective jump term for singlescale problems as considered in [19] is approximated by numerical quadrature rules. While results about the effect of numerical integration on DG-FEM for advectiondiffusion problems (with nonlinear advection) have been derived in [52,53], those results cannot be easily integrated into our analysis, as weaker norms have been used.…”
Section: A Priori Error Estimates For Macro Spatial Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us mention here e.g. papers [1,3,5,7,[12][13][14][15]18]. A survey of miscellaneous discontinuous Galerkin techniques can be found e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%